Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Who Am I to Judge? [REVIEW]James R. Martel - 2009 - Political Theory 37 (2):290 - 295.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Deleuze and the Political.[author unknown] - 2001 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 63 (4):801-801.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Against d.Lynn M. Sanders - 1997 - Political Theory 25 (3):347-376.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   83 citations  
  • Against Deliberation.Lynn Sanders - 1997 - Political Theory 25 (3):347-376.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   166 citations  
  • Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman & Jurgen Habermas - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   803 citations  
  • Brains, Citizens, and Democracy's New Nobility.Sharon R. Krause - 2006 - Theory and Event 9 (1).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Nomadologie affirmative et machine de guerre.Eugene Holland - 2006 - Symposium 10 (1):353-361.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Are We Losing Our Minds? Cognitive Science and the Study of Politics.John G. Gunnell - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (6):704-731.
    Contemporary literature in cognitive science and the philosophy of mind points to the locus of significant unresolved theoretical and methodological issues in political theory and political science, and particularly to the persistently anomalous status of mental concepts. The manner in which political and social theorists have accessed and deployed this literature, however, has been highly selective and conceptually problematical. The purpose has often been to justify prior agendas, and issues relating to how brain processes are involved in an explanation of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Rule of Reasons. Three Models of Deliberative Democracy.Rainer Forst - 2001 - Ratio Juris 14 (4):345-378.
    In this paper, the author contrasts three models of deliberative democracy: a liberal one, a communitarian one, and an alternative to both. Rather than understanding deliberative democracy as the rule of principles of justice or of communal values, the third model conceives of it as the “rule of reasons.” On the basis of a discussion of seven components of an “ethos of democracy” (the cognitive capacities of citizens, political virtues, the cultural, institutional and material conditions of democracy, political legitimacy, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Rhetoric and the Public Sphere.Simone Chambers - 2009 - Political Theory 37 (3):323-350.
    The pathologies of the democratic public sphere, first articulated by Plato in his attack on rhetoric, have pushed much of deliberative theory out of the mass public and into the study and design of small scale deliberative venues. The move away from the mass public can be seen in a growing split in deliberative theory between theories of democratic deliberation (on the ascendancy) which focus on discrete deliberative initiatives within democracies and theories of deliberative democracy (on the decline) that attempt (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • American Nightmare.Wendy Brown - 2006 - Political Theory 34 (6):690-714.
    Neoliberalism and neoconservatism are two distinct political rationalities in the contemporary United States. They have few overlapping formal characteristics, and even appear contradictory in many respects. Yet they converge not only in the current presidential administration but also in their de-democratizing effects. Their respective devaluation of political liberty, equality, substantive citizenship, and the rule of law in favor of governance according to market criteria on the one side, and valorization of state power for putatively moral ends on the other, undermines (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • The Democratic Paradox.Chantal Mouffe - 2000 - Verso.
    From the theory of ‘deliberative democracy’ to the politics of the ‘third way’, the present Zeitgeist is characterized by attempts to deny what Chantal Mouffe contends is the inherently conflictual nature of democratic politics. Far from being signs of progress, such ideas constitute a serious threat to democratic institutions. Taking issue with John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on one side, and the political tenets of Blair, Clinton and Schröder on the other, Mouffe brings to the fore the paradoxical nature of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   326 citations  
  • The Will to Believe.William James - 1896 - The New World 5:327--347.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   117 citations  
  • Matter and Memory.Henri Bergson, Nancy Margaret Paul & W. Scott Palmer - 1911 - International Journal of Ethics 22 (1):101-107.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations