Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Are quantum particles objects?Simon Saunders - 2006 - Analysis 66 (1):52-63.
    Particle indistinguishability has always been considered a purely quantum mechanical concept. In parallel, indistinguishable particles have been thought to be entities that are not properly speaking objects at all. I argue, to the contrary, that the concept can equally be applied to classical particles, and that in either case particles may (with certain exceptions) be counted as objects even though they are indistinguishable. The exceptions are elementary bosons (for example photons).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   154 citations  
  • The Identity Problem for Realist Structuralism.J. Keranen - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):308--330.
    According to realist structuralism, mathematical objects are places in abstract structures. We argue that in spite of its many attractions, realist structuralism must be rejected. For, first, mathematical structures typically contain intra-structurally indiscernible places. Second, any account of place-identity available to the realist structuralist entails that intra-structurally indiscernible places are identical. Since for her mathematical singular terms denote places in structures, she would have to say, for example, that 1 = − 1 in the group (Z, +). We call this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • Particulars re-clothed.V. C. Chappell - 1964 - Philosophical Studies 15 (4):60 - 64.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Bare particulars.Edwin B. Allaire - 1963 - Philosophical Studies 14 (1-2):1 - 8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • Another look at bare particulars.Edwin B. Allaire - 1965 - Philosophical Studies 16 (1-2):16 - 21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits.Bertrand Russell - 1948 - London and New York: Routledge.
    How do we know what we "know"? How did we –as individuals and as a society – come to accept certain knowledge as fact? In _Human Knowledge,_ Bertrand Russell questions the reliability of our assumptions on knowledge. This brilliant and controversial work investigates the relationship between ‘individual’ and ‘scientific’ knowledge. First published in 1948, this provocative work contributed significantly to an explosive intellectual discourse that continues to this day.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   335 citations  
  • On the Relations of Universals and Particulars.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 12:1-24.
    The purpose of the following, paper is to consider whether there is a fundamenital division of the objects with which metaphysics is concerned into two classes, universals and particulars, or whetlher there is any method of overcoming this dualism. My own opinion is that the dualism is ultimate; on the other hand, many men with whom, in the main, I am in close agreement, hold that it is not ultimate. I do not feel the grounds in favour of its ultimate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  • Do relations individuate?Jack W. Meiland - 1966 - Philosophical Studies 17 (5):65 - 69.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Structuralism reconsidered.Fraser MacBride - 2005 - In Stewart Shapiro (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 563--589.
    The basic relations and functions that mathematicians use to identify mathematical objects fail to settle whether mathematical objects of one kind are identical to or distinct from objects of an apparently different kind, and what, if any, intrinsic properties mathematical objects possess. According to one influential interpretation of mathematical discourse, this is because the objects under study are themselves incomplete; they are positions or akin to positions in patterns or structures. Two versions of this idea are examined. It is argued (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • Can structuralism solve the ‘access’ problem?Fraser MacBride - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):309–317.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Mathematical structuralism and the identity of indiscernibles.James Ladyman - 2005 - Analysis 65 (3):218–221.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  • Book Review: Stewart Shapiro. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. [REVIEW]John P. Burgess - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):283-291.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • Philosophy of mathematics: structure and ontology.Stewart Shapiro - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    Do numbers, sets, and so forth, exist? What do mathematical statements mean? Are they literally true or false, or do they lack truth values altogether? Addressing questions that have attracted lively debate in recent years, Stewart Shapiro contends that standard realist and antirealist accounts of mathematics are both problematic. As Benacerraf first noted, we are confronted with the following powerful dilemma. The desired continuity between mathematical and, say, scientific language suggests realism, but realism in this context suggests seemingly intractable epistemic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   251 citations