- Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning.Douglas N. Walton - 1996 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.details
|
|
Why argue? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation.Cristiano Castelfranchi & Fabio Paglieri - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):71-91.details
|
|
Ruinous Arguments: Escalation of disagreement and the dangers of arguing.Fabio Paglieri - unknowndetails
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.details
|
|
The Uses of Argument.Frederick L. Will & Stephen Toulmin - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (3):399.details
|
|
Truthfulness and relevance.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2002 - Mind 111 (443):583-632.details
|
|
Seeing to it that an agent forms a belief.Heinrich Wansing - 2002 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 10:185.details
|
|
Doxastic Decisions, Epistemic Justification, and The Logic of Agency.Heinrich Wansing - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 128 (1):201-227.details
|
|
A reduction of doxastic logic to action logic.Heinrich Wansing - 2000 - Erkenntnis 53 (1-2):267-283.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation. [REVIEW]Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):381-392.details
|
|
Review of Richard Tuck: Natural rights theories: their origin and development. [REVIEW]Andrew Reeve - 1981 - Ethics 92 (1):159-160.details
|
|
Natural rights theories: their origin and development.Richard Tuck - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Doxastic compatibilism and the ethics of belief.Sharon Ryan - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):47-79.details
|
|
Behavioral Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of Reinstatement.Iyad Rahwan, Mohammed I. Madakkatel, Jean-François Bonnefon, Ruqiyabi N. Awan & Sherief Abdallah - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (8):1483-1502.details
|
|
Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding. [REVIEW]Fabio Paglieri & John Woods - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):127-139.details
|
|
Enthymematic parsimony.Fabio Paglieri & John Woods - 2011 - Synthese 178 (3):461 - 501.details
|
|
The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1995 - Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 6 (1):189-200.details
|
|
Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments.Dale Hample, Ben Warner & Dorian Young - 2008 - Argumentation 23 (1):21-37.details
|
|
Arguers as editors.Dale Hample & JudithM Dallinger - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (2):153-169.details
|
|
Habermas as a Philosopher. [REVIEW]Jurgen Habermas - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):641-657.details
|
|
What does arguing look like?Jean Goodwin - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):79-93.details
|
|
Argument Has No Function.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90.details
|
|
Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.details
|
|
Morals By Agreement. [REVIEW]David Copp - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (3):411-414.details
|
|
Normative Models of Rational Agency: The Theoretical Disutility of Certain Approaches.Dov Gabbay & John Woods - 2003 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 11 (6):597-613.details
|
|
Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.Ralph H. Johnson - 2000 - Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.details
|
|
Rationality redeemed?: further dialogues on an educational ideal.Harvey Siegel - 1997 - London: Routedge.details
|
|
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.details
|
|
The Moral Foundations of Politics.Ian Shapiro - 2003 - London: Yale University Press.details
|
|
Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986/1995 - Oxford: Blackwell.details
|
|
Deciding to Believe.Carl Ginet - 2001 - In Matthias Steup (ed.), Knowledge, Truth and Duty. Oxford University Press. pp. 63-76.details
|
|
No more charity, please! Enthymematic parsimony and the pitfall of benevolence.Fabio Paglieri - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa. pp. 1--26.details
|
|
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.details
|
|
Argumentation Schemes in Argument-as-Process and Argument-as-Product.Chris Reed & Douglas Walton - unknowndetails
|
|
Arguments that Backfire.Daniel H. Cohen - 2005 - In D. Hitchcock & D. Farr (eds.), The Uses of Argument. OSSA. pp. 58-65.details
|
|
A test of the argument engagement model in Romania.Ioana Cionea, Dale Hample, Fabio Paglieri & Lilian Bermejo-Luque - unknowndetails
|
|
Response to my commentator.Fabio Paglieri - 2013 - Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference 10.details
|
|
Epistemic deontology and the voluntariness of belief “.Matthias Steup - 2000 - Acta Analytica 15:25-56.details
|
|
Two concepts of argument.Daniel J. O'Keefe - 1992 - In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation. Foris Publications. pp. 11--79.details
|
|