Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. O papel dos argumentos sofísticos no ensino de filosofia.Rafael Farias Gomes - 2024 - Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ciência, Filosofia e Cognição: Uma comparação entre as epistemologias naturalizadas de Quine, Hume e Aristóteles.Fernanda Cardoso - 2024 - Dissertation, University of Campinas
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Dialectical Syllogism in Aristotle’s Topics.Fernando Martins Mendonça - 2023 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 33:1-34.
    The purpose of this paper is an attempt to delimitate what the dialectical syllogism looks like in Aristotle’s Topics. Aristotle never gave an example of a dialectical syllogism, but we have some clues spread over books I and VIII of the Topics which make it possible to understand at least what within a dialectical debate is a dialectical syllogism. The interpretation advanced here distinguishes the logical order of the dialectical argumentation from the order of the debate. This distinction enables us (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Contra os Moralistas: contrapontos a quatro leituras de viés moral da Arte Retórica de Aristóteles.Saulo Bandeira de Oliveira Marques - 2019 - Dissertation, Federal University of Paraíba, Brazil
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • La teoría del silogismo simpliciter en las Refutaciones Sofísticas de Aristóteles.Gonzalo Llach Villalobos - 2020 - Dissertation, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Teoria Aristotélica da Demonstração Científica.Charles Andrade Santana - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Campinas, Brazil
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Aristotle and the necessity of scientific knowledge.Lucas Angioni - manuscript
    This is a translation, made by myself, of the paper to be published in Portuguese in the journal Discurso, 2020, in honour of the late professor Oswaldo Porchat. I discuss what Aristotle was trying to encode when he said that the object of scientific knowledge is necessary, or that what we know (scientifically) cannot be otherwise etc. The paper is meant as a continuation of previous papers—orientated towards a book on the Posterior Analytics—and thus does not discuss in much detail (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Aristóteles e a necessidade do conhecimento científico.Lucas Angioni - 2020 - Discurso 50 (2):193-238.
    I discuss the exact meaning of the thesis according to which the object of scientific knowledge is necessary. The thesis is expressed by Aristotle in the Posterior Analytics, in his definition of scientific knowledge. The traditional interpretation understands this definition as depending on two parallel and independent requirements, the causality requirement and the necessity requirement. Against this interpretation, I try to show, through the examination of several passages that refer to the definition of scientific knowledge, that the necessity requirement specifies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Does Aristotle have a dialectical attitude in EE I 6: a negative answer.Fernando Martins Mendonça - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 20:161-190.
    In this paper, I analyse EE I 6, where Aristotle presented a famous methodological digression. Many interpreters have taken this chapter as advocating a dialectical procedure of enquiry. My claim is that Aristotle does not keep a dialectical attitude towards endoxa or phainomena in this chapter. In order to accomplish my goal, I shall show that EE I 6 does not provide enough evidence for the dialectical construal of it, and that this construal, in turn, hangs on some assumptions brought (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Um Estudo sobre os Paralogismos Acidentais nas 'Refutações Sofísticas' de Aristóteles.Victor Augusto Barbosa Vieira - 2019 - Dissertation, Ufg, Brazil
    Our object of study in this dissertation is the paralogism due to the concomitant ( which we’ll call abreviated “PDC”). This paralogism is analysed by Aristotle in the Sophistical Refutations as a false argument. Our study about this paralogismo is divided into four chapters. Trough the first chapter we pretend to answer an important question about the PDC’s appearance. Although this paralogism is a false argument, it possess certain similarity with arguments recognized as good by the one refuted. This similarity (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A defesa do princípio de não-contradição e a refutação da sofística no livro IV da Metafísica de Aristóteles.Samantha da Graça Simões - 2014 - Dissertation, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • OS TÓPICOS E COMPETÊNCIA DIALÉTICA: LÓGICA E LINGUAGEM NA CODIFICAÇÃO DO DEBATE DIALÉTICO.Fernando Martins Mendonça - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Campinas
    Our aim is to argue for a deflationary interpretation of Aristotelian dialectic in the Topics, showing that dialectic is, for Aristotle, a specific sort of regulated debate, in contrast to a widely spread kind of interpretation which conceives dialectic as a method of philosophical investigation. Our claim is that an analysis carefully conducted of certain key texts does provide us with sufficient evidences for defending that the Topics is a handbook which codifies an existent art. This codification has a descriptive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Discurso Judicial: um discurso sofista?Leonardo Vergani Amos - 2024 - Dissertation, Federal University of Minas Gerais
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Theoretical Unity of Aristotle’s Categorical Syllogistic and Sophistics.Gonzalo Llach - forthcoming - History and Philosophy of Logic:1-18.
    The hypothesis of a theoretical unity between On Sophistical Refutations and Prior Analytics presents a major challenge to scholars attempting to unify the criteria of analysis. This paper examines this problem and proposes a middle ground between the perspectives of Woods and Boger to address this crucial question: If a unitary and coherent theory of deduction exists, why does not the technical apparatus of syllogistic modes for analyzing fallacies appear in SE? This paper makes useful contributions to the discussion on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Dialética e verdade em Aristóteles.Cristiane Szynwelski - 2022 - Dissertation, Universidade de Brasília
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Erística: uma Arte do Falar e do Argumentar em Platão e Aristóteles.Daiana Carolina da Silva Fernandes Couto - 2019 - Dissertation, Uffrj, Brazil
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Sobre a diabolé na prova pelo éthos na retórica judicial.Saulo Bandeira de Oliveira Marques - 2021 - Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (Ufrn) 28 (55):146-165.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Aristotle on the demarcation of dialectical and sophistical arguments.Paolo Fait - 2016 - Antiquorum Philosophia 10:25-46.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation