- A Mid-blue Logic.Danilo Suster - 2022 - In Boran Berčić, Aleksandra Golubović & Majda Trobok (eds.), HUMAN RATIONALITY Festschrift for Nenad Smokrović. Rijeka: University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. pp. 211-228.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
The Greenhouse: A Welfare Assessment and Some Morals.Christoph Lumer - 2002 - Lanham, MD; New York; Oxford: University Press of America.details
|
|
Enciclopédia de Termos Lógico-Filosóficos.João Miguel Biscaia Branquinho, Desidério Murcho & Nelson Gonçalves Gomes (eds.) - 2006 - São Paulo, SP, Brasil: Martins Fontes.details
|
|
The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation.Harald R. Wohlrapp - 2014 - Dordrecht NL: Springer.details
|
|
How to formalize informal logic.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - unknowndetails
|
|
Futher reflections on semantic minimalism: Reply to Wedgwood.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 437-474..details
|
|
Two-Phase Epistemology and Models for Dialogue Logic.E. M. Barth - 1985 - Philosophica 35.details
|
|
Non-deductive Logic in Mathematics: The Probability of Conjectures.James Franklin - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 11--29.details
|
|
Neurath’s Congestions, Depth of Intention, and Precization: Arne Naess and His Viennese Heritage.Jan Radler - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):59-90.details
|
|
Informal Logic: An Overview.J. Anthony Blair & Ralph H. Johnson - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (2).details
|
|
The Paradox of Charity.Marcin Lewiński - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (4):403-439.details
|
|
Ideals of rationality in dialogic.John Woods - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):395-408.details
|
|
The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):265-274.details
|
|
Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):53-71.details
|
|
(1 other version)Dialogical connexive logic.Shahid Rahman & Helge Rückert - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):105-139.details
|
|
Hard cases: A procedural approach. [REVIEW]Jaap C. Hage, Ronald Leenes & Arno R. Lodder - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (2):113-167.details
|
|
La argumentación a la luz de la filosofía de la biología.Yáñez Cristián Santibáñez - 2016 - Revista de Filosofía 72:165-182.details
|
|
Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Rob Grootendorst, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Rise of Informal Logic: Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning, and Politics.Ralph Henry Johnson - 1996 - Newport, VA, USA: Vale Press. Edited by J. Anthony Blair, Trudy Govier, Leo Groarke, John Hoaglund & Christopher W. Tindale.details
|
|
Argumentation and the Force of Reasons.Robert C. Pinto - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (3):268-295.details
|
|
Inconsistent Commitments and Commitment to Inconsistencies.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1990 - Informal Logic 12 (1).details
|
|
Pragmatic Inconsistency and Credibility.Jan Albert van Laar - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (3):317-334.details
|
|
(1 other version)Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.details
|
|
Relevance.David Hitchcock - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):251-270.details
|
|
Dialogue theory for critical thinking.Douglas N. Walton - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (2):169-184.details
|
|
Burden of proof.DouglasN Walton - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):233-254.details
|
|
(1 other version)A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.details
|
|
(1 other version)Non-cooperation in dialogue logic.Dov Gabbay & John Woods - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):161 - 186.details
|
|
Either/or/and : From dualism to ambivalence.Cor Weele - unknowndetails
|
|
Logic, Reasoning, Argumentation: Insights from the Wild.Frank Zenker - 2018 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 27 (4):421-451.details
|
|
Differences Between Argumentative and Rhetorical Space.Ralph Johnson - unknowndetails
|
|
Commentary on Blair.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknowndetails
|
|
(1 other version)Argumentation Theory and the conception of epistemic justification.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2009 - In Marcin Koszowy (ed.), Informal logic and argumentation theory. Białystok: University of Białystok. pp. 285--303.details
|
|
Johnson`s The Rise of Informal Logic: Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning and Politics.David Hitchcock - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2):269-83.details
|
|
Pragma-Dialectics and the Function of Argumentation.Christoph Lumer - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (1):41-69.details
|
|
DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 1999 - Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.details
|
|
The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):317-331.details
|
|
(1 other version)In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies.Douglas Walton - 2000 - Synthese 123 (3):327-346.details
|
|
(1 other version)Preface.Shahid Rahman & Helge Rückert - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):1-6.details
|
|
Formal systems of dialogue rules.Erick C. W. Krabbe - 1984 - Synthese 58 (2):295 - 328.details
|
|
I guess.Jim Mackenzie - 1987 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (3):290 – 300.details
|
|
Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law.Jaap Hage - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):137-172.details
|
|
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
Why Play Logical Games?Mathieu Marion - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 3--26.details
|
|
(1 other version)Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-291.details
|
|
Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy.Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.) - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.details
|
|
Argumentation and learning.Baruch B. Schwarz - 2009 - In Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and education. New York: Springer. pp. 91--126.details
|
|
Some axioms underlying argumentation theory.George Boger - unknowndetails
|
|