- Ranking Theory.Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Niels Skovgaard-Olsen & Wolfgang Spohn - 2021 - In Markus Knauff & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), The Handbook of Rationality. London: MIT Press. pp. 337-345.details
|
|
Full & Partial Belief.Konstantin Genin - 2019 - In Richard Pettigrew & Jonathan Weisberg (eds.), The Open Handbook of Formal Epistemology. PhilPapers Foundation. pp. 437-498.details
|
|
Proof Paradoxes and Normic Support: Socializing or Relativizing?Marcello Di Bello - 2020 - Mind 129 (516):1269-1285.details
|
|
Overcoming Luck: Two Trends in Legal Philosophy.Jeffrey S. Helmreich - 2018 - Analysis 78 (2):335-347.details
|
|
The Logical Dimension of Argumentation and Its Semantic Appraisal in Bermejo-Luque’s Giving Reasons.James B. Freeman - 2011 - Theoria 26 (3):289-299.details
|
|
'More Likely Than Not' - Knowledge First and the Role of Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2017 - In Carter Adam, Gordon Emma & Jarvis Benjamin (eds.), Knowledge First,. Oxford University Press. pp. 278-292.details
|
|
Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability.James B. Freeman - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):25-40.details
|
|
Wigmore's Chart Method.Jean Goodwin & Alec Fisher - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (3).details
|
|
Belief, credence, and norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.details
|
|
From Classical to Intuitionistic Probability.Brian Weatherson - 2003 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (2):111-123.details
|
|
Five Questions : Wolfgang Spohn.Wolfgang Spohn - unknowndetails
|
|
Can Self-determined Actions be Predictable?Amit Pundik - 2019 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15 (2):121-140.details
|
|
Focused correlation and confirmation.Gregory Wheeler - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):79-100.details
|
|
Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson.Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson, Stephan Hartmann & Josh Snyder - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):539-563.details
|
|
Legal reasoning with subjective logic.Audun Jøsang & Viggo A. Bondi - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (4):289-315.details
|
|
Intersubjective probability and confirmation theory.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):513-533.details
|
|
When statistical evidence is not specific enough.Marcello Di Bello - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):12251-12269.details
|
|
Privacy rights and ‘naked’ statistical evidence.Lauritz Aastrup Munch - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3777-3795.details
|
|
Belief and Credence: A Defense of Dualism.Elizabeth Jackson - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Notre Damedetails
|
|
Factors for Evaluating Presumptions and Presumptive Inferences.James Freeman - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):215-240.details
|
|
When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?Martin Smith - 2018 - Mind 127 (508):1193-1218.details
|
|
Estándares múltiples de prueba en medicina y derecho.Andrés Páez - 2015 - In Andrés Páez (ed.), Hechos, evidencia y estándares de prueba. Ensayos de epistemología jurídica. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia: Ediciones Uniandes. pp. 123-152.details
|
|
Resolving Moral Dissensus: Possibilities for Argumentation.James B. Freeman - unknowndetails
|
|
What types of arguments are there?James B. Freeman - unknowndetails
|
|
Focused Correlation, Confirmation, and the Jigsaw Puzzle of Variable Evidence.Maximilian Schlosshauer & Gregory Wheeler - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):376-92.details
|
|
Understanding induction.John Macnamara - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):21-48.details
|
|
When Are Two Witnesses Better Than One?David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg - unknowndetails
|
|
Ranking Functions, AGM Style.Wolfgang Spohn - 1999 - Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors.details
|
|
Corroborating testimony, probability and surprise.Erik J. Olsson - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):273-288.details
|
|
Knowledge, Individualised Evidence and Luck.Dario Mortini - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (12):3791-3815.details
|
|
Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference.Hillel J. Einhorn & Robin M. Hogarth - 1985 - Psychological Review 92 (4):433-461.details
|
|
Coherence and Confirmation through Causation.Gregory Wheeler & Richard Scheines - 2013 - Mind 122 (485):135-170.details
|
|
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. [REVIEW]Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):325-353.details
|
|
Evidence marshaling for imaginative fact investigation.David A. Schum - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3):165-188.details
|
|
On the divorce between philosophy and argumentation theory.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2012 - Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 21 (42):479-498.details
|
|
(1 other version)Reviews. [REVIEW]D. V. Lindley - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):293-296.details
|
|
Can Interpretations Ever Be Acceptable Basic Premises?James B. Freeman - unknowndetails
|
|
The Method of Relevant Variables, Objectivity, and Boas.B. Freeman James - unknowndetails
|
|