- 'More Likely Than Not' - Knowledge First and the Role of Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2017 - In Carter Adam, Gordon Emma & Jarvis Benjamin (eds.), Knowledge First,. Oxford University Press. pp. 278-292.details
|
|
Evidential Reasoning.Marcello Di Bello & Bart Verheij - 2011 - In G. Bongiovanni, Don Postema, A. Rotolo, G. Sartor, C. Valentini & D. Walton (eds.), Handbook in Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 447-493.details
|
|
Francis Bacon's “VERULAMIUM” the common‐law template of the modern in english science and culture.Harvey Wheeler - 1999 - Angelaki 4 (1):7 – 26.details
|
|
Focused correlation and confirmation.Gregory Wheeler - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):79-100.details
|
|
Some Artificial Intelligence Tools for Argument Evaluation: An Introduction.Douglas Walton - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):317-340.details
|
|
The corroboration paradox.Carl G. Wagner - 2013 - Synthese 190 (8):1455-1469.details
|
|
Certainty Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.Giovanni Tuzet - 2023 - Contemporary Pragmatism 20 (4):398-423.details
|
|
Bentham's Theory of Fictions. A "Curious Double Language".Nomi Maya Stolzenberg - 1999 - Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 11 (2):223-261.details
|
|
Epistemic justification: its subjective and its objective ways.Wolfgang Spohn - 2018 - Synthese 195 (9):3837-3856.details
|
|
When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?Martin Smith - 2018 - Mind 127 (508):1193-1218.details
|
|
More on Normic Support and the Criminal Standard of Proof.Martin Smith - 2021 - Mind 130 (519):943-960.details
|
|
Conjecture, acquiescence, and John Millar's history of Ireland.Paul B. Smith - 1996 - The European Legacy 1 (8):2227-2248.details
|
|
Focused Correlation, Confirmation, and the Jigsaw Puzzle of Variable Evidence.Maximilian Schlosshauer & Gregory Wheeler - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):376-92.details
|
|
Evidence marshaling for imaginative fact investigation.David A. Schum - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3):165-188.details
|
|
Coherence and Confirmation through Causation.Gregory Wheeler & Richard Scheines - 2013 - Mind 122 (485):135-170.details
|
|
Legal proof and statistical conjunctions.Lewis D. Ross - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (6):2021-2041.details
|
|
On the divorce between philosophy and argumentation theory.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2012 - Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 21 (42):479-498.details
|
|
Can Self-determined Actions be Predictable?Amit Pundik - 2019 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15 (2):121-140.details
|
|
In defence of the modal account of legal risk.Duncan Pritchard - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-16.details
|
|
Corroborating testimony and ignorance: A reply to Bovens, Fitelson, Hartmann and Snyder.Erik J. Olsson - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):565-572.details
|
|
Corroborating testimony, probability and surprise.Erik J. Olsson - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):273-288.details
|
|
Feminist Philosophy of Science.Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 312–331.details
|
|
The infinite epistemic regress problem has no unique solution.Ronald Meester & Timber Kerkvliet - 2019 - Synthese 198 (6):4973-4983.details
|
|
Understanding induction.John Macnamara - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):21-48.details
|
|
Reviews. [REVIEW]D. V. Lindley - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):293-296.details
|
|
Legal reasoning with subjective logic.Audun Jøsang & Viggo A. Bondi - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (4):289-315.details
|
|
Is the mind Bayesian? The case for agnosticism.Jean Baratgin & Guy Politzer - 2006 - Mind and Society 5 (1):1-38.details
|
|
Belief, Credence, and Evidence.Elizabeth Jackson - 2020 - Synthese 197 (11):5073-5092.details
|
|
Overcoming Luck: Two Trends in Legal Philosophy.Jeffrey S. Helmreich - 2018 - Analysis 78 (2):335-347.details
|
|
Hume on probability.Barry Gower - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):1-19.details
|
|
Wigmore's Chart Method.Jean Goodwin & Alec Fisher - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (3).details
|
|
Corroboration: Sensitivity, Safety, and Explanation.David Godden - 2019 - Acta Analytica 34 (1):15-38.details
|
|
Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability.James B. Freeman - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):25-40.details
|
|
Toward a rational theory of progress.Menachem Fisch - 1994 - Synthese 99 (2):277 - 304.details
|
|
Proof Paradoxes and Normic Support: Socializing or Relativizing?Marcello Di Bello - 2020 - Mind 129 (516):1269-1285.details
|
|
Trial by Statistics: Is a High Probability of Guilt Enough to Convict?Marcello Di Bello - 2019 - Mind 128 (512):1045-1084.details
|
|
Are people programmed to commit fallacies? Further thoughts about the interpretation of experimental data on probability judgment.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (3):251–274.details
|
|
Belief, credence, and norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.details
|
|
The chemistry of substances and the philosophy of mass terms.J. Brakel - 1986 - Synthese 69 (3):291 - 324.details
|
|
Statistical Evidence, Normalcy, and the Gatecrasher Paradox.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2020 - Mind 129 (514):563-578.details
|
|
Sensitivity, Causality, and Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):102-112.details
|
|
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. [REVIEW]Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):325-353.details
|
|
Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases.Marvin Backes - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2759-2778.details
|
|
Five Questions : Wolfgang Spohn.Wolfgang Spohn - unknowndetails
|
|
When Are Two Witnesses Better Than One?David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg - unknowndetails
|
|
What types of arguments are there?James B. Freeman - unknowndetails
|
|
The Method of Relevant Variables, Objectivity, and Boas.B. Freeman James - unknowndetails
|
|
Estándares múltiples de prueba en medicina y derecho.Andrés Páez - 2015 - In Hechos, evidencia y estándares de prueba. Ensayos de epistemolgía jurídica. Ediciones Uniandes. pp. 123-152.details
|
|
Ranking Functions, AGM Style.Wolfgang Spohn - 1999 - Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors.details
|
|
Can Interpretations Ever Be Acceptable Basic Premises?James B. Freeman - unknowndetails
|
|