- Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy.Jamie Shaw - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6053-6084.details
|
|
Partisan Scholarship in Technoscientific Controversies : Reflections on Research Experience.Vasilis Galis & Anders Hansson - unknowndetails
|
|
Alternative explanations of the cosmic microwave background: A historical and an epistemological perspective.Milan M. Ćirković & Slobodan Perović - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:1-18.details
|
|
The experimenters' regress: from skepticism to argumentation.Benoı̂t Godin & Yves Gingras - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):133-148.details
|
|
Truth in Evidence and Truth in Arguments without Logical Omniscience.Gregor Betz - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1117-1137.details
|
|
Malthus and Ricardo: Two styles for Economic Theory.Sergio Cremaschi & Marcelo Dascal - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (2):229-254.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Do Disputes over Priority Tell Us Anything about Science?Alan G. Gross - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (2):161-179.details
|
|
Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement.Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):39-65.details
|
|
A Web of Controversies: Complexity in the Burgess Shale Debate. [REVIEW]Christian Baron - 2011 - Journal of the History of Biology 44 (4):745 - 780.details
|
|
Right decisions or happy decision-makers?Katie Steele, Helen M. Regan, Mark Colyvan & Mark A. Burgman - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (4):349 – 368.details
|
|
Captives of Controversy: The Myth of the Neutral Social Researcher in Contemporary Scientific Controversies.Brian Martin, Evelleen Richards & Pam Scott - 1990 - Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (4):474-494.details
|
|
An even-handed debate? The sexed/gendered controversy over laterality genes in British psychology, 1970s–1990s.Tabea Cornel - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (5):138-166.details
|
|
Beyond Harmony and Consensus: A Social Conflict Approach to Technology.Mikael Hård - 1993 - Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (4):408-432.details
|
|
Are Untestable Scientific Theories Acceptable?Osvaldo Pessoa - 2016 - Science & Education 25 (3-4):443-448.details
|
|
(1 other version)Why Ecumenism Fails: Taking Theological Differences Seriously.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 2007 - Christian Bioethics 13 (1):25-51.details
|
|
Polemics in Public: Poncelet, Gergonne, Plücker, and the Duality Controversy.Jemma Lorenat - 2015 - Science in Context 28 (4):545-585.details
|
|
Social aspects of scientific knowledge.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2020 - Synthese 197 (1):447-468.details
|
|
The Study of Controversies and the Theory and History of Science.Marcelo Dascal - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (2):147-154.details
|
|
Expertise, Ethics Expertise, and Clinical Ethics Consultation: Achieving Terminological Clarity.Ana S. Iltis & Mark Sheehan - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):416-433.details
|
|