- A Spinozist Aesthetics of Affect and Its Political Implications.Christopher Davidson - 2017 - In Gábor Boros, Judit Szalai & Oliver Toth (eds.), The Concept of Affectivity in Early Modern Philosophy. Budapest, Hungary: Eötvös Loránd University Press. pp. 185-206.details
|
|
The Concept of Affectivity in Early Modern Philosophy.Gábor Boros, Judit Szalai & Oliver Toth (eds.) - 2017 - Budapest, Hungary: Eötvös Loránd University Press.details
|
|
Descartes on Will and Suspension of Judgment: Affectivity of the Reasons for Doubt.Jan Forsman - 2017 - In Gábor Boros, Judit Szalai & Oliver Toth (eds.), The Concept of Affectivity in Early Modern Philosophy. Budapest, Hungary: Eötvös Loránd University Press. pp. 38-58.details
|
|
‘Archetypes without Patterns’: Locke on Relations and Mixed Modes.Walter Ott - 2017 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 99 (3):300-325.details
|
|
(1 other version)Faith, Belief and Fictionalism.Finlay Malcolm & Michael Scott - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):257-274.details
|
|
The legend of the justified true belief analysis.Julien Dutant - 2015 - Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1):95-145.details
|
|
Locke on sense perception.Walter Ott - 2021 - In Jessica Gordon-Roth & Shelley Weinberg (eds.), The Lockean Mind. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 116-126.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Berkeley: sobre el conocimiento nocional de la mente.Alberto Luis López - 2017 - Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 22 (1).details
|
|
Considerações Sobre a Ideia de Natureza do Conhecimento Científico na Tradição Filosófica Ocidental.Cassiano Terra Rodrigues - 2006 - Cognitio-Estudos.details
|
|
Concept Formation and Scientific Objectivity: Weyl’s Turn against Husserl.Iulian D. Toader - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2):281-305.details
|
|
The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics.Peter Ludlow - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
(1 other version)Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up.Nick Bostrom - manuscriptdetails
|
|
Locke on the role of judgment in perception.Walter Ott - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):670-684.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Berkeley: el papel de Dios en la teoría de la visión / The Role of God in Berkeley's Theory of Vision.Alberto Luis López - 2015 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 49:27-52.details
|
|
Hume on Curiosity.Axel Gelfert - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (4):711-732.details
|
|
Jonathan Edwards, God, and “particular minds”.William J. Wainwright - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):201-213.details
|
|
Philosophical Argumentation: Logic and Rhetoric. [REVIEW]S. Frogel - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):171-188.details
|
|
Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs.Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.) - 2024 - Boston: De Gruyter.details
|
|
The other as the essence of existence: a journal of a philosophical passage to altruism.Iraklis Ioannidis - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Glasgowdetails
|
|
The significance of the Barrovian Case: The Barrovian Case is a technical problem, hitherto unsolved, involving either a double convex lens or a concave mirror. The problem, due to Isaac Barrow and reported by Berkeley in his New theory of vision, is that what is seen in certain instances with these devices seems to violate historically important principles of optics. One is the ‘ancient principle’ of Euclid that the object should be seen at the intersection of the refracted ray with the perpendicular of incidence; the other is the principle attributed to Kepler that the perceived distance of an object varies indirectly with the divergence of the rays it sends to the eye. The most obvious difficulty is that the object should appear, impossibly, behind the eye. As it happens, despite some strong claims that have been made about the significance of the problem, the principles generating it no longer have the centrality in optics they were once thought to have. But even accepting them, th. [REVIEW]Thomas M. Lennon - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):36-55.details
|
|
Newtonian Forces.Jessica Wilson - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):173-205.details
|
|
Subjectivity and essential individuality: A dialogue with Peter Van Inwagen and Lynne Baker. [REVIEW]Roberta Monticelli - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (2):225-242.details
|
|
Another Idealism: Berkeley, Kant and Schopenhauer. Kerkmann, J. (2024). Unendliches Bewusstsein. Berkeleys Idealismus und dessen kritische Weiterentwicklung bei Kant und Schopenhauer. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter. [REVIEW]Ivan Ivashchenko - 2024 - Sententiae 43 (1):176-180.details
|
|
10 Mathematics: Signification and Significance.Clare Marie Moriarty - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 185-210.details
|
|
Francis Hutcheson, da beleza à perspectiva do desígnio.Lisa Broussois - 2014 - Discurso 44:97-126.details
|
|
L’idée comme chose. L’immatérialisme de Berkeley.Jean-Christophe Bardout - 2018 - Quaestio 18:253-276.details
|
|
Jones, Tom. George Berkeley: A Philosophical Life. Princeton / Oxford: Princeton University Press 2021, xxi + 622 pp. [REVIEW]Manuel Fasko - 2023 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105 (4):685-688.details
|
|