- Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Metaphors in the Wealth of Nations.Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2002 - In Boehm Stephan, Christian Gehrke, Heinz D. Kurz, Richard Sturn, Donald Winch, Mark Blaug, Klaus Hamberger, Jack Birner, Sergio Cremaschi, Roger E. Backhouse, Uskali Maki, Luigi Pasinetti, Erich W. Streissler, Philippe Mongin, Augusto Graziani, Hans-Michael Trautwein, Stephen J. Meardon, Andrea Maneschi, Sergio Parrinello, Manuel Fernandez-Lopez, Richard van den Berg, Sandye Gloria-Palermo, Hansjorg Klausinger, Maurice Lageux, Fabio Ravagnani, Neri Salvadori & Pierangelo Garegnani (eds.), Is There Progress in Economics? Knowledge, Truth and the History of Economic Thought. Stephan Boehm, Christian Gehrke, Heinz D. Kurz, Richard Sturn (eds). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. pp. 89-114.details
|
|
Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing about Doing.Christian Kock (ed.) - 2017 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
Obscurum per obscurium. Language and Science in the Sokal Affair.Sonia Madrid Cánovas - 2008 - Arbor 184 (731).details
|
|
Oppression, Privilege, Bias, Prejudice, and Stereotyping: Problems in the APA Code of Ethics.William T. O’Donohue - 2016 - Ethics and Behavior 26 (7):527-544.details
|
|
Rationality and Irrationality: Proceeedings of the 23rd International Wittgenstein Symposium, 13-19 August 2000, Kirchberg Am Wechsel.Berit Brogaard & Barry Smith (eds.) - 2001 - Öbv&Hpt.details
|
|
Scientific myth‐conceptions.Douglas Allchin - 2003 - Science Education 87 (3):329-351.details
|
|
Malthus and Ricardo: Two styles for Economic Theory.Sergio Cremaschi & Marcelo Dascal - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (2):229-254.details
|
|
Locke and Leibniz on the Balance of Reasons.Markku Roinila - 2013 - In Dana Riesenfeld & Giovanni Scarafile (eds.), Perspectives on Theory of Controversies and the Ethics of Communication: Explorations of Marcelo Dascal's Contributions to Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 49-57.details
|
|
Choice is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation. [REVIEW]Christian Kock - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):61-80.details
|
|
Narrative rationality and the logic of scientific discourse.Walter R. Fisher - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (1):21-32.details
|
|
Rhetoric, science, and philosophy.John O'neill - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):205--25.details
|
|
La Fundamentación Filosófica de los Principios No-Empíricos de Investigación.Sergio H. Menna - 2004 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 8 (1):55-83.details
|
|
How are scientific corrections made?Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):347-356.details
|
|
Agnes Arber: Form in the mind and the eye.Maura C. Flannery - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):281 – 300.details
|
|
From Omega to Mr. Adam: The Importance of Literature for Feminist Science Studies.Susan Squier - 1999 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 24 (1):132-158.details
|
|
Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science.Kristian H. Nielsen - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (9):2067-2086.details
|
|
(1 other version)Review symposium: A reply to Brock.Roderick D. Buchanan - 2012 - History of the Human Sciences 25 (3):139-147.details
|
|
Models and the locus of their truth.Uskali Mäki - 2011 - Synthese 180 (1):47 - 63.details
|
|
Is it safe to eat that? Raw oysters, risk assessment and the rhetoric of science.Robert Danisch & Jessica Mudry - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (2):129 – 143.details
|
|
Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation.E. Popa, Vincent Blok & R. Wesselink - 2020 - Public Understanding of Science 1 (29):76-93.details
|
|
La retórica de la ciencia: orígenes y perspectivas de un proyecto de estudio de la ciencia.Javier Gómez Ferri - 1995 - Endoxa 1 (5):125.details
|
|
Rhetoric of Effortlessness in Science.James W. McAllister - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (2):145-166.details
|
|
Causality in Contemporary American Sociology: An Empirical Assessment and Critique.Brandon Vaidyanathan, Michael Strand, Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick, Thomas Buschman, Meghan Davis & Amanda Varela - 2016 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (1):3-26.details
|
|
The Frankfurt School, Science and Technology Studies, and the Humanities.Finn Collin & David Budtz Pedersen - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (1):44-72.details
|
|
Marginalizing Experience: A Critical Analysis of Public Discourse Surrounding Stem Cell Research in Australia (2005–6). [REVIEW]Tamra Lysaght, John Miles Little & Ian Harold Kerridge - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):191-202.details
|
|
Ontological relativity and meaning‐variance: A critical‐constructive review.Christopher Norris - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):139 – 173.details
|
|
Material Rhetoric: Spreading Stones and Showing Bones in the Study of Prehistory.David Van Reybrouck, Raf de Bont & Jan Rock - 2009 - Science in Context 22 (2):195-216.details
|
|
Do Disputes over Priority Tell Us Anything about Science?Alan G. Gross - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (2):161-179.details
|
|
Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation.William Rehg - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):161-182.details
|
|
Arguing about definitions.Edward Schiappa - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):403-417.details
|
|
Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Deciding Staged Battles of the Past: On the Rhetorics of Olaf Müller’s Historical Philosophy of Science.Michael Hampe - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (4):569-580.details
|
|
From Disabled Students to Disabled Brains: The Medicalizing Power of Rhetorical Images in the Israeli Learning Disabilities Field.Ofer Katchergin - 2017 - Journal of Medical Humanities 38 (3):267-285.details
|
|
The chronogeography of persuasion: Normative prospects in constructivist science studies.Ger Wackers - 1992 - Social Epistemology 6 (3):299 – 313.details
|
|
Logical fallacies and invasion biology.Radu Cornel Guiaşu & Christopher W. Tindale - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (5-6):34.details
|
|
The failure of certainty: Why economics needs rhetoric.Jerry Petersen - unknowndetails
|
|
Intertextual Reference in Nineteenth-Century Mathematics.John O'Neill - 1993 - Science in Context 6 (2):435-468.details
|
|
Argumentation Theory and the Recent Philosophy of Science.William Rehg - unknowndetails
|
|
Alan Gross and the rhetoric of science.Randy Harris - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (3):pp. 346-380.details
|
|
Booknotes.R. M. - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (1):403-406.details
|
|
Commentary on Little.Mark L. Weinstein - unknowndetails
|
|
Critical Science Literacy for Science Majors: Introducing Future Scientists to the Communicative Arts.Maria E. Gigante - 2014 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 34 (3-4):77-86.details
|
|
Opportunity, opportunism, and progress:Kairos in the rhetoric of technology. [REVIEW]Carolyn R. Miller - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (1):81-96.details
|
|
The science wars and the ethics of book reviewing.Alan G. Gross - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3):445-450.details
|
|
The Way We Ask for Money… The Emergence and Institutionalization of Grant Writing Practices in Academia.Kathia Serrano Velarde - 2018 - Minerva 56 (1):85-107.details
|
|
Transformation Discourse: Nuclear Risk as a Strategic Tool in Late Soviet Politics of Expertise.Sonja D. Schmid - 2004 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 29 (3):353-376.details
|
|
Living signs in a rigidly patterned world: How healthy can it be?Floyd Merrell - 2003 - Semiotica 2003 (147):107-134.details
|
|
Booknotes.R. M. - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (4):403-406.details
|
|
The Public Understanding of Science—A Rhetorical Invention.Simon Locke - 2002 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 27 (1):87-111.details
|
|