- On the Harms of Agnotological Practices and How to Address Them.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2023 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):211-228.details
|
|
Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way.Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger - 2020 - Synthese 198 (S23):5803-5823.details
|
|
Analysis: The lack of diversity in climate-science research.Ayesha Tandon - 2021 - Carbon Brief 2021 (10):1-25.details
|
|
The limitations to our understanding of peer review. [REVIEW]Tony Ross-Hellauer & Jonathan P. Tennant - 2020 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1).details
|
|
Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect.Remco Heesen & Jan-Willem Romeijn - 2019 - Philosophers' Imprint 19.details
|
|
Jury Theorems for Peer Review.Marcus Arvan, Liam Kofi Bright & Remco Heesen - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.details
|
|
The Necessity of Commensuration Bias in Grant Peer Review.Remco Heesen - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8 (39):423--443.details
|
|
Is Peer Review a Good Idea?Remco Heesen & Liam Kofi Bright - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3):635-663.details
|
|
A Plea for Minimally Biased Empirical Philosophy.Andrea Polonioli - unknowndetails
|
|
Promote Scientific Integrity via Journal Peer Review Data.Carole J. Lee - 2017 - Science 357 (6348):256-257.details
|
|
A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy.Andrea Polonioli - 2019 - Synthese 196 (9):3841-3867.details
|
|
Pluralism and Peer Review in Philosophy.J. Katzav & K. Vaesen - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17.details
|
|
When journal editors play favorites.Remco Heesen - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (4):831-858.details
|
|
Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.David B. Resnik & Susan A. Elmore - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):169-188.details
|
|
Education Journal Editors’ Perspectives on Self-Plagiarism.Samuel V. Bruton & John R. Rachal - 2015 - Journal of Academic Ethics 13 (1):13-25.details
|
|
Revisiting Current Causes of Women's Underrepresentation in Science.Carole J. Lee - 2016 - In Michael Brownstein & Jennifer Mather Saul (eds.), Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The limited effectiveness of prestige as an intervention on the health of medical journal publications.Carole J. Lee - 2013 - Episteme 10 (4):387-402.details
|
|
A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (5):859-870.details
|
|
The social dimensions of scientific knowledge.Helen Longino - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Argumentative Exchange in Science: How Social Epistemology Brings Longino back down to Earth.Emma Nyhof Ajdari - 2023 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):35-59.details
|
|
New Data on the Linguistic Diversity of Authorship in Philosophy Journals.Chun-Ping Yen & Tzu-Wei Hung - 2019 - Erkenntnis 84 (4):953-974.details
|
|
The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor.J. A. García, Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez & J. Fdez-Valdivia - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):265-283.details
|
|
Why Not Open the Black Box of Journal Editing in Philosophy? Make Peer Reviews of Published Papers Available.Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell & Esben Nedenskov Petersen - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (3):245-257.details
|
|
Can the Behavioral Sciences Self-correct? A Social Epistemic Study.Felipe Romero - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60 (C):55-69.details
|
|
Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation.Jia Zhu, Gabriel Fung, Wai Hung Wong, Zhixu Li & Chuanhua Xu - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1073-1094.details
|
|
Parapsychological Phenomena Examples of Generalized Nonlocal Correlations – A Theoretical Framework.Harald Walach - 2014 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 28 (4).details
|
|
Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):275-285.details
|
|
Beyond Data Collection: Ethical Issues in Minority Research.Eli Talbert - 2019 - Ethics and Behavior 29 (7):531-546.details
|
|
Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science.P. Kyle Stanford - 2015 - Synthese 196 (10):3915-3932.details
|
|
Cognitive colonialism: Nationality bias in Brazilian academic philosophy.Murilo Rocha Seabra, Luke Prendergast, Gabriel Silveira de Andrade Antunes & Laura Tolton - 2023 - Metaphilosophy 54 (1):106-118.details
|
|
Structural causes of citation gaps.Hannah Rubin - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (7):2323-2345.details
|
|
Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review.Lambros Roumbanis - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (6):1302-1333.details
|
|
Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way.Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger - 2020 - Synthese (Suppl 23):1-21.details
|
|
Retracting Inconclusive Research: Lessons from the Séralini GM Maize Feeding Study.David B. Resnik - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (4):621-633.details
|
|
Psa 2018.Philsci-Archive -Preprint Volume- - unknowndetails
|
|
From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review.David Pontille & Didier Torny - 2015 - Human Studies 38 (1):57-79.details
|
|
A Social Epistemological Inquiry into Biases in Journal Peer Review.Saana Jukola - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (1):124-148.details
|
|
How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector.Stephen J. Cowley - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:155311.details
|
|
The Power of Peer Review on Transdisciplinary Discovery.Elina I. Mäkinen - 2019 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 44 (6):1020-1047.details
|
|
Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant?Serge P. J. M. Horbach & Willem Halffman - 2020 - Minerva 58 (2):139-161.details
|
|
Coping with the Conflict-of-Interest Pandemic by Listening to and Doubting Everyone, Including Yourself.Lynn T. Kozlowski - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):591-596.details
|
|
Evaluation of Research(ers) and its Threat to Epistemic Pluralisms.Marco Viola - 2017 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13 (2):55-78.details
|
|
On the conditions for objectivity : how to avoid bias in socially relevant research.Saana Jukola - unknowndetails
|
|
Commercial interests, agenda setting, and the epistemic trustworthiness of nutrition science.Saana Jukola - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 10):2629-2646.details
|
|
Questionable Research Practices and Credit in Academic Careers.Remco Heesen - manuscriptdetails
|
|
Scientists’ Conceptions of Good Research Practice.Nora Hangel & Jutta Schickore - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (6):766-791.details
|
|
Impact of Alumni Connections on Peer Review Ratings and Selection Success Rate in National Research.Dong-Seong Han, Gil-Mo Kang, Soogwan Doh & Duckhee Jang - 2017 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 42 (1):116-143.details
|
|
Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness.Stephen A. Gallo, Karen B. Schmaling, Lisa A. Thompson & Scott R. Glisson - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (2):1-20.details
|
|
Frequency and Type of Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review of Basic Biomedical Research Funding Applications: Self-Reporting Versus Manual Detection.Stephen A. Gallo, Michael Lemaster & Scott R. Glisson - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):189-197.details
|
|
Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965.Pierpaolo Dondio, Didier Torny, Flaminio Squazzoni & Aileen Fyfe - 2020 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (3):405-429.details
|
|