Switch to: References

Citations of:

Know-how as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account

Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (2017)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. ‘Know-How as Competence: A Rylean Responsibilist Account’, by David Löwenstein. [REVIEW]Yuri Cath - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Relational Account of Intellectual Autonomy.Benjamin Elzinga - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):22-47.
    According to relational views of autonomy, some social relations or forms of dependence are necessary for autonomous agency. Recent relational theorists have primarily focused on autonomy of action or practical autonomy, and the result has been a shift away from individualistic conceptions of autonomy in the practical realm. Despite these trends, individualistic conceptions are still the default when it comes to autonomy of belief or intellectual autonomy. In this paper, I argue for a relational account of intellectual autonomy. Specifically, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Concepts and Action. Know-How and Beyond.David Löwenstein - forthcoming - In Christoph Demmerling & Dirk Schröder (eds.), Concepts in Thought, Action, and Emotion. New Essays. London, Ontario, Kanada:
    Which role do concepts play in a person's actions? Do concepts underwrite the very idea of agency in somebody's acting? Or is the appeal to concepts in action a problematic form of over-intellectualization which obstructs a proper picture of genuine agency? Within the large and complicated terrain of these questions, the debate about know-how has been of special interest in recent years. In this paper, I shall try to spell out what know-how can tell us about the role of concepts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Wissen, Können und Verstehen.Hannes Worthmann - 2019 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 67 (1):139-145.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie Jahrgang: 67 Heft: 1 Seiten: 139-145.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Regresse Und Routinen. Repliken Auf Brandt Und Jung.David Löwenstein - 2018 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 72 (1):110-113.
    This paper responds to comments and criticisms by Stefan Brandt and Eva-Maria Jung, directed at the book "Know-how as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account".
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Précis Zu Know-How as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account.David Löwenstein - 2018 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 72 (1):95-99.
    This is a précis of my book "Know-how as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account".
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Know-how, Routinen und Automatismen. Ein Kommentar zu David Löwensteins Know-how as Competence.Eva-Maria Jung - 2018 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 72 (1):105-109.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Knowledge-How, Abilities, and Questions.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:00-00.
    The debate about the nature of knowledge-how is standardly thought to be divided between intellectualist views, which take knowledge-how to be a kind of propositional knowledge, and anti-intellectualist views, which take knowledge-how to be a kind of ability. In this paper, I explore a compromise position—the interrogative capacity view—which claims that knowing how to do something is a certain kind of ability to generate answers to the question of how to do it. This view combines the intellectualist thesis that knowledge-how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Intellectualizing Know How.Benjamin Elzinga - 2019 - Synthese:1-20.
    Following Gilbert Ryle’s arguments, many philosophers took it for granted that someone knows how to do something just in case they have the ability to do it. Within the last couple decades, new intellectualists have challenged this longstanding anti-intellectualist assumption. Their central contention is that mere abilities aren’t on the same rational, epistemic level as know how. My goal is to intellectualize know how without over-intellectualizing it. Intelligent behavior is characteristically flexible or responsive to novelty, and the distinctive feature of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Dispositional Account of Practical Knowledge.Constantin Jan - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (9):2309-2329.
    Is knowledge-how, or “practical” knowledge, a species of knowledge-that, or “theoretical” knowledge? There is no comfortable position to take in the debate around this question. On the one hand, there are counterexamples against the anti-intellectualist thesis that practical knowledge is best analysed as an ability. They show that having an ability to ϕ is not necessary for knowing how to ϕ. On the other hand, the intellectualist analysis of practical knowledge as a subspecies of theoretical knowledge is threatened by its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Verantwortliche Kontrolle und Ryleanische Regresse. Kommentar zu David Löwensteins Know-how as Competence.Stefan Brandt - 2018 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 72 (1):100-104.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • ›Wissen, dass‹ und ›Wissen, wie‹.David Löwenstein - 2019 - In Martin Grajner & Guido Melchior (eds.), Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler. pp. 116-121.
    This is an introduction to the debate about Know-how.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Are Abilities Dispositions?Barbara Vetter - forthcoming - Synthese 196 (1).
    Abilities are in many ways central to what being an agent means, and they are appealed to in philosophical accounts of a great many different phenomena. It is often assumed that abilities are some kind of dispositional property, but it is rarely made explicit exactly which dispositional properties are our abilities. Two recent debates provide two different answers to that question: the new dispositionalism in the debate about free will, and virtue reliabilism in epistemology. This paper argues that both answers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations