- Should social science be critical?Martyn Hammersley - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):175-195.details
|
|
Philosophy, Exposure, and Children: How to Resist the Instrumentalisation of Philosophy in Education.Gert Biesta - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (2):305-319.details
|
|
(3 other versions)Social epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Epistemic Standards for Participatory Technology Assessment: Suggestions Based Upon Well-Ordered Science.Juan M. Durán & Zachary Pirtle - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1709-1741.details
|
|
Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing.Daniel J. Dunleavy - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-27.details
|
|
Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1287-1313.details
|
|
The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.Gemma E. Derrick & Gabrielle N. Samuel - 2016 - Minerva 54 (1):75-97.details
|
|
Different rates of agreement on acceptance and rejection: A statistical artifact?Marilyn E. Demorest - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-145.details
|
|
Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.Fred Delcomyn - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-144.details
|
|
Universities as Anarchic Knowledge Institutions.Säde Hormio & Samuli Reijula - 2023 - Social Epistemology (2):119-134.details
|
|
La crítica de la ciencia en España después del 68.Francisco Díaz-Fierros Viqueira - 2019 - Arbor 195 (794):531-531.details
|
|
The Importance of Gatekeeping in Citizen Science.Mark S. Davis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):56-58.details
|
|
What should be done improve reviewing?Rick Crandall - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):143-143.details
|
|
Risk, Morality, and Child Protection: Risk Calculation as Guides to Practice.Gerald Cradock - 2004 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 29 (3):314-331.details
|
|
Revolutions in science, revolutions in chemistry.Jeffrey I. Seeman - 2023 - Foundations of Chemistry 25 (2):321-335.details
|
|
Misrepresentation of Marginalized Groups: A Critique of Epistemic Neocolonialism.Rashedur Chowdhury - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 186 (3):553-570.details
|
|
Evaluating emotions in medical practice: a critical examination of ‘clinical detachment’ and emotional attunement in orthopaedic surgery.Helene Scott-Fordsmand - 2022 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (3):413-428.details
|
|
An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication.Mohammad Hosseini, Jonathan Lewis, Hub Zwart & Bert Gordijn - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (3):1-24.details
|
|
Is forensic science in crisis?Michał Sikorski - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-34.details
|
|
Revisiting the ‘Darwin–Marx correspondence’: Multiple discovery and the rhetoric of priority.Joel Barnes - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (2):29-54.details
|
|
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?John D. Cone - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):142-142.details
|
|
Unreliable peer review: Causes and cures of human misery.Andrew M. Colman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):141-142.details
|
|
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.Stephen Cole - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):140-141.details
|
|
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?Patricia Cohen - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):139-140.details
|
|
Replicability Crisis and Scientific Reforms: Overlooked Issues and Unmet Challenges.Mattia Andreoletti - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):135-151.details
|
|
Assume a can opener.Cory J. Clark, Calvin Isch, Paul Connor & Philip E. Tetlock - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e36.details
|
|
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.details
|
|
Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.details
|
|
Epistemic Consequences of Bibliometrics-based Evaluation: Insights from the Scientific Community.Tommaso Castellani, Emanuele Pontecorvo & Adriana Valente - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (4):398-419.details
|
|
Where Does Open Science Lead Us During a Pandemic? A Public Good Argument to Prioritize Rights in the Open Commons.Benjamin Capps - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):11-24.details
|
|
Accident Proneness : A Classic Case of Simultaneous Discovery/Construction in Psychology.John C. Burnham - 2008 - Science in Context 21 (1):99-118.details
|
|
Philosophy from the outside.Mario Bunge - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (2):227-245.details
|
|
Epistemic democracy and the role of experts.Cathrine Holst & Anders Molander - 2019 - Contemporary Political Theory 18 (4):541-561.details
|
|
Transforming academia: The role of education.Joakim Juhl & Anders Buch - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (8):803-814.details
|
|
Morgan, the ‘Gratuitous’ Logic of Sport, and the Art of Self-Imposed Constraints.Sigmund Loland - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (4):348-360.details
|
|
How to distinguish medicalization from over-medicalization?Emilia Kaczmarek - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):119-128.details
|
|
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.Robert F. Bornstein - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):138-139.details
|
|
Power, politics, and the development of political science in the Americas.Thibaud Boncourt & Paulo Ravecca - 2020 - Science in Context 33 (2):95-100.details
|
|
Academic success in America: analytic philosophy and the decline of Wittgenstein.Guido Bonino & Paolo Tripodi - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (2):359-392.details
|
|
Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science.Kristian H. Nielsen - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (9):2067-2086.details
|
|
Science as a moral system.Stefaan Blancke - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-18.details
|
|
Replication or Monopoly? The Economies of Invention and Discovery in Galileo's Observations of 1610.Mario Biagioli - 2001 - Science in Context 14 (s1):277-320.details
|
|
Replication or Monopoly? The Economies of Invention and Discovery in Galileo's Observations of 1610.Mario Biagioli - 2000 - Science in Context 13 (3-4):547-590.details
|
|
Twenty-first century perspectivism: The role of emotions in scientific inquiry.Mark Alfano - 2017 - Studi di Estetica 7 (1):65-79.details
|
|
Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling.Louise Bezuidenhout & Nathaniel A. Warne - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1161-1179.details
|
|
Transformative science: a new index and the impact of non-funding, private funding, and public funding.Barrett R. Anderson & Gregory J. Feist - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (2):130-151.details
|
|
Talcott Parsons and the Sociology of Science: An Essay in Appreciation and Remembrance.Bernard Barber - 1989 - Theory, Culture and Society 6 (4):623-635.details
|
|
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.John C. Bailar - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):137-138.details
|
|
Education and scholarship in the twenty-first-century marketplace.Ivan Ascher & Will Roberts - 2015 - Contemporary Political Theory 14 (4):409-433.details
|
|