- Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.details
|
|
Philosophy and Rhetoric: An Abbreviated History of an Evolving Identity.Gerard A. Hauser - 2007 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (1):1 - 14.details
|
|
Table of the Different Relations Observed in Chemistry between Different Substances 27 August 1718.Etienne-François Geoffroy - 1996 - Science in Context 9 (3):313-320.details
|
|
Evidence, Emotion and Eminence: A Qualitative and Evaluative Analysis of Doctors’ Skills in Macroallocation.Siun Gallagher, Miles Little & Claire Hooker - 2019 - Health Care Analysis 27 (2):93-109.details
|
|
Is the Enthymeme a Syllogism?James Fredal - 2018 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 51 (1):24-49.details
|
|
Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability.James B. Freeman - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):25-40.details
|
|
The Origins of and Possible Futures for Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's Dissociation of Concepts.David A. Frank - 2020 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 53 (4):385-399.details
|
|
Varieties of rhetoric in science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1990 - History of the Human Sciences 3 (2):177-193.details
|
|
The Argument Form "Appeal to Galileo": A Critical Appreciation of Doury’s Account.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (3):221-272.details
|
|
Eugene Garver, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief: University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2004, Xi + 272 pp. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):109-114.details
|
|
Verbal Signatures of Dissociation: Epitomizing and Limiting Cases.Jeanne Fahnestock - 2020 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 53 (4):417-432.details
|
|
Rhetorical Citizenship and the Science of Science Communication.Jeanne Fahnestock - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (3):371-387.details
|
|
Arguing in Different Forums: The Bering Crossover Controversy.Jeanne Fahnestock - 1989 - Science, Technology and Human Values 14 (1):26-42.details
|
|
Presumptions in Legal Argumentation.Douglas Walton Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (3):271-300.details
|
|
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2):154-182.details
|
|
Creative Argumentation: When and Why People Commit the Metaphoric Fallacy.Francesca Ervas, Antonio Ledda, Amitash Ojha, Giuseppe Antonio Pierro & Bipin Indurkhya - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.details
|
|
Metaphor, ignorance and the sentiment of (ir)rationality.Francesca Ervas - 2021 - Synthese.details
|
|
Moral argumentation as a rhetorical practice in popular online discourse: Examples from online comment sections of celebrity gossip.Maria Eronen - 2014 - Discourse and Communication 8 (3):278-298.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
Corpus linguistics and argumentation.Chiara Degano - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (2):113-138.details
|
|
Critique Without Critics?Marcelo Dascal - 1997 - Science in Context 10 (1):39-62.details
|
|
The Reason of Rhetoric.Emmanuelle Danblon - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):493-507.details
|
|
The Notion of Pseudo-Argument in Perelman’s Thought.Emmanuelle Danblon - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):351-359.details
|
|
Dissuasion as a Rhetorical Technique of Creating a General Disposition to Inaction.Emmanuelle Danblon - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):1-9.details
|
|
The Public Dimension Of Scientific Controversies.Jeanine Czubaroff - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (1):51-74.details
|
|
Universalities.James Crosswhite - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):430-448.details
|
|
The Rhetorical Unconscious of Argumentation Theory: Toward a Deep Rhetoric.James Crosswhite - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):392-414.details
|
|
The new rhetoric project.James Crosswhite - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):301-307.details
|
|
The EBM Argument Hygiene Campaign.Peter Cramer - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):447-453.details
|
|
The rise of the gay warrior: Rhetorical archetypes and the transformation of identity categories.Doug Cloud - 2019 - Discourse and Communication 13 (1):26-47.details
|
|
Things of the World: Migration, Presence, and the Arts of Presencing.Ralph Cintrón & Jason Schneider - 2019 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 52 (2):115-141.details
|
|
Defining the Term "Argument".P. Chittleborough & M. E. Newman - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (3).details
|
|
Against “We,” or an Argument for a Pluralistic Definition of Personhood in Bioethics.Tod Chambers - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (3):173-174.details
|
|
Janus‐Faced Coherentism and the Forgotten Role of Formal Principles.Rodrigo Camarena González - 2021 - Ratio Juris 34 (3):263-281.details
|
|
A Theory of Fan-Type Dissociation.Martin Camper - 2020 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 53 (4):433-449.details
|
|
Methodological invention as a constructive project: Exploring the production of ethical knowledge through the interaction of discursive logics.Elizabeth M. Bucar - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):355-373.details
|
|
An observational analysis of argument structures: The case of Nightline. [REVIEW]BrentG Brossmann & DanielJ Canary - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (2):199-212.details
|
|
Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’.Salomi Boukala - 2016 - Discourse Studies 18 (3):249-268.details
|
|
An epistemological plea for methodological individualism and rational choice theory in cognitive rhetoric.Alban Bouvier - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):51-70.details
|
|
Between the quack and the fanatic: movements in our self-belief. [REVIEW]Jonathan Bolton - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (3):281-285.details
|
|
On the strength of presumptions.Petar Bodlović - 2022 - Pragmatics and Cognition 29 (1):82-110.details
|
|
Presumptions, and How They Relate to Arguments from Ignorance.Petar Bodlović - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (4):579-604.details
|
|
Enrolling the Toggle Switch: Visionary Claims and the Capability of Modeling Objects in the Disciplinary Formation of Synthetic Biology.Clemens Blümel - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (3):269-287.details
|
|
Try to see it my way: Modelling persuasion in legal discourse. [REVIEW]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (4):271-287.details
|
|
The missing link revisited: The role of teleology in representing legal argument. [REVIEW]T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):79-94.details
|
|
HYPO's legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):205-250.details
|
|
Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation: Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314.details
|
|
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald P. Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton & Adam Z. Wyner - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3):215-319.details
|
|
Introduction.Gillian Beer & Herminio Martins - 1990 - History of the Human Sciences 3 (2):163-175.details
|
|
Deep Agreements.Michael D. Baumtrog - forthcoming - Episteme:1-16.details
|
|