- Bilim İnsanlarının Perspektifinden Sınırlandırma Problemi.M. Efe Ateş - 2023 - Felsefe Arkivi (59):56-77.details
|
|
Objectivity and ‘First Philosophies’ [Chapter 1 of Objectivity].Guy Axtell - 2015 - In Objectivity. Polity Press, 2015. Introduction and T. of Contents. Polity; Wiley. pp. 19-45.details
|
|
Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem.Maarten Boudry - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (2):83-101.details
|
|
The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation.Damian Fernandez-Beanato - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (3):375-390.details
|
|
La distinction entre falsification et rejet dans le problème de la démarcation de Karl Popper.Nicolae Sfetcu - 2020 - Drobeta Turnu Severin: MultiMedia Publishing.details
|
|
Bilim ve Sözde Bilim: Bilimsel Topluluğun Doğasının Belirlenmesi ve Sözde Bilimin Ayırt Edilmesine Yönelik Sosyal Bir Ölçüt.Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı - 2019 - Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 18 (2):567-588.details
|
|
The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper.Nicolae Sfetcu - 2019 - Bucharest, Romania: MultiMedia Publishing.details
|
|
Cementing Science. Understanding Science through Its Development.Veli Virmajoki - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Turkudetails
|
|
Distincția dintre falsificare și respingere în problema demarcației la Karl Popper.Nicolae Sfetcu - 2018 - Bucharest, Romania: MultiMedia Publishing.details
|
|
The Public Understanding of What? Laypersons' Epistemic Needs, the Division of Cognitive Labor, and the Demarcation of Science.Arnon Keren - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (5):781-792.details
|
|
Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion.Gregory W. Dawes - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):283-298.details
|
|
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.details
|
|
Qual a motivação para se defender uma teoria causal da memória?César Schirmer Dos Santos - 2018 - In Juliano Santos do Carmo & Rogério F. Saucedo Corrêa (eds.), Linguagem e cognição. NEPFil. pp. 63-89.details
|
|
(1 other version)Los parásitos de la ciencia. Una caracterización psicocognitiva del engaño pseudocientífico.Angelo Fasce - 2017 - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 32 (3):347.details
|
|
Cunoașterea științifică – Metodologii.Nicolae Sfetcu - 2023 - Cunoașterea Științifică 2 (2):3-26.details
|
|
Scienticity and Artistry Across All Subjects.Anthony Lock - 2018 - Philosophia 46 (2):355-377.details
|
|
Exposing Medical Pseudo-Science May Be Unethical.Ehud Lamm - manuscriptdetails
|
|
Having Science in View: General Philosophy of Science and its Significance.Stathis Psillos - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Scientific Foundation of Business Models Theory: Research Traditions Approach.Tadeusz Sierotowicz & Tomasz Sierotowicz - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (2):233-245.details
|
|
Can Science Investigate the Supernatural? An investigation into the relationship between science, the supernatural and religion.Jonathan Winthrop - unknowndetails
|
|
Feng shui and the Demarcation Project.Damian Fernandez-Beanato - 2021 - Science & Education 30 (6):1333–1351.details
|
|
In defense of provisory methodological naturalism.Eric Christopher Eck - unknowndetails
|
|
Genuine versus bogus scientific controversies: the case of statins.Carlo Martini & Mattia Andreoletti - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (4):1-23.details
|
|
Controversy as a Blind Spot in Teaching Nature of Science.Mario Kötter & Marcus Hammann - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (5):451-482.details
|
|
Science and Illusions.Luigi Scorzato - details
|
|