- Derek Price's Puzzles: Numerical Metaphors for the Operation of Science.Belver C. Griffith - 1988 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (3-4):351-360.details
|
|
Understanding High Achievement: The Case for Eminence.Joseph Baker, Jörg Schorer, Srdjan Lemez & Nick Wattie - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.details
|
|
Current perspectives on the development of the philosophy of informatics.Paweł Polak - 2017 - Philosophical Problems in Science 63:77-100.details
|
|
Normalized Paper Credit Assignment: A Solution for the Ethical Dilemma Induced by Multiple Important Authors.Hui Fang - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1589-1601.details
|
|
Crowdsourced science: sociotechnical epistemology in the e-research paradigm.David Watson & Luciano Floridi - 2018 - Synthese 195 (2):741-764.details
|
|
Repertoires: A post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research.Rachel A. Ankeny & Sabina Leonelli - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60:18-28.details
|
|
El estudio de casos en las bases de datos del Science Citation Index, Social Science Citation Index_ y _Arts and Humanities Citation Index.Emilio Delgado López-Cózar & Antonio Fernández Cano - 2002 - Arbor 171 (675):609-629.details
|
|
Realism and the absence of rivals.Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Synthese 194 (7):2427-2446.details
|
|
Most cited business ethics publications: mapping the intellectual structure of business ethics studies in 2001-2008.Zhenzhong Ma, Dapeng Liang, Kuo-Hsun Yu & Yender Lee - 2012 - Business Ethics: A European Review 21 (3):286-297.details
|
|
Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Productive Engagement.Eric Palmer - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diegodetails
|
|
The economics of science.Arthur M. Diamond - 1996 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 9 (2):6-49.details
|
|
Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.details
|
|
Should the blinded lead the blinded?Stephen P. Lock - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):156-157.details
|
|
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.Michael J. Mahoney - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-157.details
|
|
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.Linda D. Nelson - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):158-159.details
|
|
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.Lawrence J. Stricker - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):163-164.details
|
|
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.details
|
|
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.Stephen Cole - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):140-141.details
|
|
Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.Fred Delcomyn - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-144.details
|
|
On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.J. Barnard Gilmore - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):148-149.details
|
|
Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.details
|
|
Figures de la signature scientifique.David Pontille - 2000 - Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 109:283-316.details
|
|
Was Mendel's paper on Pisum neglected or unknown?Michael H. MacRoberts - 1985 - Annals of Science 42 (3):339-345.details
|
|
The Rise and Demise of the International Council for Science Policy Studies (ICSPS) as a Cold War Bridging Organization.Aant Elzinga - 2012 - Minerva 50 (3):277-305.details
|
|
Opportunity, opportunism, and progress:Kairos in the rhetoric of technology. [REVIEW]Carolyn R. Miller - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (1):81-96.details
|
|
The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research: Present and Future.Zhenzhong Ma - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S3):255 - 265.details
|
|
Why not science for anarchists too? A reply to Feyerabend.Arne Naess - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):183 – 194.details
|
|
Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality.Erik Weber, Joke Meheus & Dietlinde Wouters (eds.) - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
The visibility of philosophy of science in the sciences, 1980–2018.Mahdi Khelfaoui, Yves Gingras, Mael Lemoine & Thomas Pradeu - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):1-31.details
|
|
Three Stages of Modern Science.Henry Bauer - 2013 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 27 (3).details
|
|
Science, Politics/Policy and the Cold War in Argentina: From Concepts to Institutional Models in the 1950s and ’60s.Adriana Feld - 2019 - Minerva 57 (4):523-547.details
|
|
Two Influential Theories of Ignorance and Philosophy's Interests in Ignoring Them.Sandra Harding - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (3):20-36.details
|
|
A Quantitative Perspective on Ethics in Large Team Science.Alexander M. Petersen, Ioannis Pavlidis & Ioanna Semendeferi - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):923-945.details
|
|
University Knowledge Production and Innovation: Getting a Grip.Arjan van Rooij - 2014 - Minerva 52 (2):263-272.details
|
|
Should the sociology of science be rated X?Douglas Allchin - 2004 - Science Education 88 (6):934-946.details
|
|
Quantification in Science and Cognition Circa 1937 A Newly Discovered Text of Ludwik Fleck.Ilana Löwy - 1988 - Science in Context 2 (2):345-355.details
|
|
Authorship patterns in psychology: National and international trends.K. D. White, L. Dalgleish & G. Arnold - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (4):190-192.details
|
|
Is there an alternative to peer review?Richard Greene - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-150.details
|
|
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?Donald Laming - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):154-156.details
|
|
Reflections on the peer review process.Herbert W. Marsh & Samuel Ball - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-158.details
|
|
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.Gerald S. Wasserman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):165-166.details
|
|
Peer review: An unflattering picture.Kenneth M. Adams - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):135-136.details
|
|
Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?J. Scott Armstrong & Raymond Hubbard - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):136-137.details
|
|
What should be done improve reviewing?Rick Crandall - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):143-143.details
|
|
Different rates of agreement on acceptance and rejection: A statistical artifact?Marilyn E. Demorest - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-145.details
|
|
Pavlov and the equivalence of associability in classical conditioning.S. R. Coleman - 2007 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 28 (2):115.details
|
|
John Ziman and post-academic science: consensibility, consensus, and reliability.Verusca Moss Simões dos Reis & Antonio Augusto Passos Videira - 2013 - Scientiae Studia 11 (3):583-611.details
|
|
Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology.Markus Schlecker & Eric Hirsch - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (1):69-87.details
|
|
Experts as non-experts: A case from SSC. [REVIEW]Hironori Ayabe - 1999 - AI and Society 13 (1-2):63-68.details
|
|
Social Media and the Production of Knowledge: A Return to Little Science?Leah A. Lievrouw - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (3):219-237.details
|
|