- Children’s Rights and the Parental Authority to Instill a Specific Value System.Jeffrey Morgan - 2006 - Essays in Philosophy 7 (1):49-66.details
|
|
Las tensiones internas del pluralismo moral.Guillermo Lariguet - 2011 - Isegoría 44:161-184.details
|
|
Norms of Legitimate Dissensus.Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (2):179-196.details
|
|
Corporate Constructed and Dissent Enabling Public Spheres: Differentiating Dissensual from Consensual Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW]Glen Whelan - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4):755-769.details
|
|
Choice is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation. [REVIEW]Christian Kock - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):61-80.details
|
|
The scientific importance of asking questions at meetings: Why virtual debate is not enough.Maureen A. O'Malley & Sabina Leonelli - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (1):35-37.details
|
|
Aporetische Anmerkung zum Verhältnis von Pluralismus und Monismus. Kommentar zu Hans Jörg Sandkühler.Gregor Schiemann - 1997 - In H. J. Sandkühler (ed.), Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Peter Lang.details
|
|
Reconstructing John Hick’s theory of religious pluralism: a Chinese folk religion’s perspective.Wai Yip Wong - unknowndetails
|
|
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.details
|
|
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.details
|
|
Pluralism within the limits of reason alone? Habermas and the discursive negotiation of consensus.Samantha Ashenden - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (3):117-136.details
|
|
Beyond absolutism and relativism in transpersonal evolutionary theory.Jorge N. Ferrer - 1998 - World Futures 52 (3):239-280.details
|
|
Heidegger and meaning: implications for phenomenological research.Mary E. Johnson - 2000 - Nursing Philosophy 1 (2):134-146.details
|
|
Methodological Pluralism in Philosophy.Sven Ove Hansson - 2010 - Theoria 76 (3):189-191.details
|
|
Value Pluralism and Liberal Politics.Robert B. Talisse - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100.details
|
|
Indeterminacy, ultimacy, and the world: The self-creation of religious pluralism through community and creation. [REVIEW]Benjamin James Chicka - 2010 - Sophia 49 (1):49-63.details
|
|
Callicott and Naess on pluralism.Andrew Light - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):273 – 294.details
|
|
(1 other version)Consensus in medical decision making: Analyzing the environment of discourse ethics.Tom Koch & Mark Ridgley - 1999 - Philosophy and Geography 2 (2):201 – 217.details
|
|
Bayesianism, convergence and social epistemology.Michael J. Shaffer - 2008 - Episteme 5 (2):pp. 203-219.details
|
|
Legal validity as doxastic obligation: From definition to normativity. [REVIEW]Giovanni Sartor - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (5):585-625.details
|
|
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.details
|
|
Partisan or liberal?Jonathan Seglow - 1998 - Res Publica 4 (2):229-239.details
|
|
Religion in the public square.Edward Langerak - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 2 (1):129–140.details
|
|
The asia Pacific issue: Richness in diversity. [REVIEW]Paul A. Komesaroff & Ian Kerridge - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):159-161.details
|
|
The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.David Estlund - 2018 - In André Bächtiger, Jane Mansbridge, John Dryzek & Mark Warren (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.details
|
|
(1 other version)Critical citizenship and democratic legitimacy.Bernard Reber - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (9):1199-1225.details
|
|
Configurations of Pluralisms. Navigating Polyphony and Diversity in Philosophy and Beyond.Machiel Keestra - 2022 - In Keith Stenning & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Rules, Regularities, Randomness. Festschrift for Michiel van Lambalgen. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation. pp. 87-99.details
|
|
Making coherent senses of success in scientific modeling.Beckett Sterner & Christopher DiTeresi - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-20.details
|
|
Stakeholder Dialogue as Agonistic Deliberation: Exploring the Role of Conflict and Self-Interest in Business-NGO Interaction.Teunis Brand, Vincent Blok & Marcel Verweij - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (1):3-30.details
|
|
The Social Epistemology of Consensus and Dissent.Boaz Miller - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 228-237.details
|
|
Pluralism and Democratic Participation: What Kind of Citizen are Citizens Invited to be?Oliver Escobar - 2017 - Contemporary Pragmatism 14 (4):416-438.details
|
|
(1 other version)Partisan or Neutral? The Futility of Public Political Theory.Alasdair Macintyre - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):731-734.details
|
|
The aporetics of religious diversity.Geert Drieghe - unknowndetails
|
|
Disagreeing about climate change: Which way forward?Mike Hulme - 2015 - Zygon 50 (4):893-905.details
|
|
Social Objectivity Under Scrutiny in the Pasteur–Pouchet Debate.José Antonio López Cerezo - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (2):301-318.details
|
|
Who's Afraid of Dissent? Addressing Concerns about Undermining Scientific Consensus in Public Policy Developments.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín & Kristen Intemann - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (4):593-615.details
|
|
Deliberation and disagreement.Hélène Landemore & Scott E. Page - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (3):229-254.details
|
|
(1 other version)El consenso como concepto filosófico-político: contribución a la historia y a la re-composición de un rompecabezas teórico.Luca Mori - 2014 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 21:12-41.details
|
|
“Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.Andy Stirling - 2008 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (2):262-294.details
|
|
Truth, lies and tweets: A Consensus Theory of Post-Truth.Vittorio Bufacchi - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (3):347-361.details
|
|
Philosophical purpose and purposive philosophy: an interview with Nicholas Rescher.Nicholas Rescher & Jamie Morgan - 2020 - Journal of Critical Realism 19 (1):58-77.details
|
|
Why is there anything at all? What does it mean to be a person? Rescher on metaphysics.Jamie Morgan - 2019 - Journal of Critical Realism 18 (2):169-188.details
|
|
Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing about Doing.Christian Kock (ed.) - 2017 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
Scientific Pluralism and Inconsistency Toleration.Dunja Šešelja - 2017 - Humana Mente 10 (32):1-29.details
|
|
La giustizia nelle interazioni delle transizioni post-conflitto.Emanuela Ceva - 2017 - Laboratorio di Politica Comparata E Filosofia Pubblica 3:5-22.details
|
|
'Explicating ways of consensus-making: Distinguishing the academic, the interface and the meta-consensus.Laszlo Kosolosky & Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2014 - In Martini Carlo (ed.), Experts and Consensus in Social Science. Springer. pp. 71-92.details
|
|
(1 other version)Consensus in Medical Decision Making: Analyzing the Environment of Discourse Ethics.Tom Koch & Mark Ridgley - 1999 - Ethics, Place and Environment 2 (2):201-217.details
|
|
Consensus, Dissensus, and a Third Way, Learned Ignorance.Dale Hample - unknowndetails
|
|
How to Distinguish Good and Bad Arguments: Dialogico-Rhetorical Normativity.Wouter H. Slob - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (2):179-196.details
|
|
Food for deliberation : philosophical reflections on responsible innovation in the business context.Teunis Brand - 2020 - Dissertation, Wageningen University and Researchdetails
|
|