- (2 other versions)An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes.Christoph Lumer - 2022 - Informal Logic 44 (1):203-290.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Dialogue Types, Argumentation Schemes, and Mathematical Practice: Douglas Walton and Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1):159-182.details
|
|
Attacking authority.Matthews Steve - 2011 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 13 (2):59-70.details
|
|
The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse.Lawrence Torcello - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):19-48.details
|
|
The Last Straw Fallacy: Another Causal Fallacy and Its Harmful Effects.Carolyn Cusick & Mark Peter - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):457-474.details
|
|
Non-deductive Logic in Mathematics: The Probability of Conjectures.James Franklin - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 11--29.details
|
|
Correct decisions and their good consequences.Steven Daniel - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):13-14.details
|
|
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.Jonathan Fuller - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):433-441.details
|
|
Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy.Kevin Korb - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):41-70.details
|
|
Informal Logic: An Overview.J. Anthony Blair & Ralph H. Johnson - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (2).details
|
|
El final de una tensión esencial: Hermenéutica filosófica y teorías de la argumentación.María G. Navarro - 2010 - Arbor 742:321-338.details
|
|
Does the Consequence Argument Beg the Question?John Martin Fischer & Garrett Pendergraft - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):575-595.details
|
|
Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq.Ahmed Sahlane - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):459-488.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.John Anthony Blair - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Walton’s Argumentation Schemes.Lumer Christoph - unknowndetails
|
|
(1 other version)Giving Reasons Does Not Always Amount to Arguing.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):659-668.details
|
|
Truth or consequences.John Heil - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):19-20.details
|
|
Can goals be uniquely defined?Ilana Ritov - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):28-29.details
|
|
The consequences of taking consequentialism seriously.Philip E. Tetlock - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):31-32.details
|
|
Learning by Arguing About Evidence and Explanations.John Dowell & Marzieh Asgari-Targhi - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):217-233.details
|
|
A Guide for the Disputatious.Norman Swartz - 1991 - Dialogue 30 (1-2):123-.details
|
|
Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic.Robert Pinto - 2001 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Toward a Shared Metaphoric Meaning in Children's Discourse: The Role of Argumentation.Tomasz Garstka & Barbara Bokus - 2009 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 40 (4):193-203.details
|
|
On begging the question when naturalizing norms.Leonard D. Katz - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):21-22.details
|
|
Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation.Michael P. Weinstock - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):103-120.details
|
|
Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument.George Boger - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):149-174.details
|
|
Rhetorical Heuristics: Probabilistic Strategies in Complex Oratorical Arguments. [REVIEW]Gabor Tahin - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):1-21.details
|
|
A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games.T. J. M. Bench-Capon, T. Geldard & P. H. Leng - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):233-254.details
|
|
Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.details
|
|
Revealing Structures of Argumentations in Classroom Proving Processes.Christine Knipping & David Reid - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 119--146.details
|
|
Normative and descriptive consequentialism.Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):15-16.details
|
|
Consequentialism and utility theory.Deborah Frisch - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):16-16.details
|
|
Moral errors.Clark Glymour - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):17-18.details
|
|
Topology in Informal Logic: Slippery Slopes and Black Holes.Norman Swartz - 1995 - Dialogue 34 (4):797-.details
|
|
In the quagmire of quibbles: a dialectical exploration.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3459-3476.details
|
|
Why care where moral intuitions come from?Susan Dwyer - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):14-15.details
|
|
Consequentialism in haste.Roger A. McCain - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):23-24.details
|
|
Nonconsequentialist decisions.Jonathan Baron - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):1-10. Translated by Jonathan Baron.details
|
|
In just what sense should I be critical? An exploration into the notion of 'assumption'and some implications for assessment.Andrés Mejía - 2009 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (4):351-367.details
|
|
Subordinating Truth – Is Acceptability Acceptable?George Boger - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (2):187-238.details
|
|
Atheistic Teleology.Scott A. Shalkowski - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):5-19.details
|
|
Treating Kuhn’s Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg . Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [REVIEW]Frank Zenker - unknowndetails
|
|
Arguing or reasoning? Argumentation in rhetorical context.Manfred Kraus - unknowndetails
|
|
Jonathan Baron, consequentialism and error theory.Sanford S. Levy - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):22-23.details
|
|
Fairness to policies, distinctions and intuitions.Jonathan E. Adler - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):10-11.details
|
|
Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry.Louise Cummings - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (2).details
|
|
A Possible Rapprochement of Informal Logic with Formal Logic.George Boger - unknowndetails
|
|
Broadening the base for bringing cognitive psychology to bear on ethics.Peter Railton - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):27-28.details
|
|
Goals, values and benefits.Frederic Schick - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):29-29.details
|
|