- Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience.Nikil Mukerji & Edzard Ernst - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-29.details
|
|
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition.Fabrizio Macagno - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (3):317-343.details
|
|
Coherence of Inferences.Matheus Silva - manuscriptdetails
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
What is a Question.Lani Watson - 2021 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 89:273-297.details
|
|
The Sources of Mill’s View of Ratiocination and Induction.Steffen Ducheyne & John P. McCaskey - 2014 - In Antis Loizides (ed.), Mill’s a System of Logic: Critical Appraisals. New York: Routledge.details
|
|
The Material Theory of Induction at the Frontiers of Science.William Peden - 2022 - Episteme 19 (2):247-263.details
|
|
Laws of Thought and Laws of Logic after Kant.Lydia Patton - 2018 - In Sandra Lapointe (ed.), Logic from Kant to Russell. New York: Routledge. pp. 123-137.details
|
|
Aristotle’s Prototype Rule-Based Underlying Logic.John Corcoran - 2018 - Logica Universalis 12 (1-2):9-35.details
|
|
The Petitio.John Woods & Douglas Walton - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):77-100.details
|
|
Attacking authority.Matthews Steve - 2011 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 13 (2):59-70.details
|
|
Johnson and the Soundness Doctrine.David Botting - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):501-525.details
|
|
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
Towards Formal Representation and Evaluation of Arguments.Marcin Selinger - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):379-393.details
|
|
Argument Diagramming in Logic, Artificial Intelligence, and Law.Chris Reed, Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2007 - The Knowledge Engineering Review 22 (1):87-109.details
|
|
The Philosophy of Error and Liberty of Thought: J.S. Mill on Logical Fallacies.Frederick Rosen - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):121-147.details
|
|
Classification of Fallacies of Relevance.Douglas Walton - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):71-103.details
|
|
It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Douglas Walton - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (2).details
|
|
Do we reason when we when we think we reason of think? [Spanish].David Miller - 2007 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 7:88-108.details
|
|
Emerging Infectious Diseases: Coping with Uncertainty. [REVIEW]Louise Cummings - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (2):171-188.details
|
|
Evaluating the Meta-Slope: Is there a Slippery Slope Argument against Slippery Slope Arguments? [REVIEW]Adam Corner & Ulrike Hahn - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (4):349-359.details
|
|
A Place for Figures of Speech in Argumentation Theory.Christian Plantin - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):325-337.details
|
|
Hare and Others on the Proposition.John Corcoran - 2011 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 15 (1):51-76.details
|
|
Guest Editor’s Introduction: JvH100. [REVIEW]Irving H. Anellis - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):249-267.details
|
|
Strategies of Character Attack.Fabrizio Macagno - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):1-33.details
|
|
The Petitio: Aristotle'S Five Ways.John Woods & Douglas Walton - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (March):77-100.details
|
|
Miracles.Timothy McGrew - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
The preface paradox dissolved.John N. Williams - 1987 - Theoria 53 (2-3):121-140.details
|
|
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2):154-182.details
|
|
A Survey of Inductive Generalization.John D. Norton - unknowndetails
|
|
Peter Hare on the proposition.John Corcoran - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):21-34.details
|
|
Logical constants.John MacFarlane - 2008 - Mind.details
|
|
The punctuational sources of the truth-functional 'or'.R. E. Jennings - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (2):237-259.details
|
|
Kant, Boole and Peirce's early metaphysics.Paul Forster - 1997 - Synthese 113 (1):43-70.details
|
|
New foundations for imperative logic I: Logical connectives, consistency, and quantifiers.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2008 - Noûs 42 (4):529-572.details
|
|
The Road to Modern Logic—An Interpretation.José Ferreirós - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):441-484.details
|
|
Two new fallacies.Sven Ove Hansson - 2024 - Theoria 90 (3):259-262.details
|
|
Presuppositional fallacies.Fabrizio Macagno - forthcoming - Argumentation:1-32.details
|
|
The Genealogy of ‘∨’.Landon D. C. Elkind & Richard Zach - 2023 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):862-899.details
|
|
Does the Dome Defeat the Material Theory of Induction?William Peden - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (5):2171-2190.details
|
|
Bothsiderism.Scott F. Aikin & John P. Casey - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (2):249-268.details
|
|
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
The Peripatetic Program in Categorical Logic: Leibniz on Propositional Terms.Marko Malink & Anubav Vasudevan - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (1):141-205.details
|
|
The Neglect of Epistemic Considerations in Logic: The Case of Epistemic Assumptions.Göran Sundholm - 2019 - Topoi 38 (3):551-559.details
|
|
On the difference between fallacy and sophism.Dufour Michel - unknowndetails
|
|
The fallacy of composition and meta-argumentation.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - unknowndetails
|
|
Inductivism in Practice: Experiment in John Herschel’s Philosophy of Science.Aaron D. Cobb - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (1):21-54.details
|
|
Environmental Ethics.Roberta L. Millstein - 2013 - In Kostas Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: a Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer.details
|
|
The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):317-331.details
|
|
Distinguo: The response to equivocation. [REVIEW]Jim Mackenzie - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):465-482.details
|
|