Autonomy and morality: A Self-Determination Theory discussion of ethics

New Ideas in Psychology 47:57-61 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Kantian ethics is based on a metaphysical conception of autonomy that may seem difficult to reconcile with the empirically-based science of psychology. I argue that, although not formally developed, a Self-Determination Theory (SDT) perspective of ethics can broaden the field of Kantian-based moral psychology and specify what it means, motivationally, to have autonomy in the application of a moral norm. More specifically, I argue that this is possible when a moral norm is fully endorsed by the self through a process of internalization that is energized by intrinsic motivation and is facilitated by the fulfillment of the basic needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. The conditions of the fulfillment of these needs may even implicitly reveal which norms will be integrated and treated as moral norms. I conclude that SDT offers a motivational approach that is useful in understanding the development of moral norms.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARVAAM
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-06-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-06-10

Total views
949 ( #4,936 of 2,445,948 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
215 ( #2,420 of 2,445,948 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.