What is an Anti-Racist Philosophy of Race and History? A New Look at Kant, Hegel, and Du Bois

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this essay, I defend the pragmatic relevance of race in history. Kant and Hegel’s racist development thesis assumes that nonwhite, non-European racial groups are defective practical agents. In response, philosophers have opted to drop race from a theory of history and progress. They posit that denying its pragmatic relevance amounts to anti-racist egalitarianism. I dub this tactic ‘colorblind cosmopolitanism’ and offer grounds for its rejection. Following Du Bois, I ascribe, instead, a pragmatic role to race in history. Namely, Du Bois argues that race is an ‘instrument of progress’ that advances emancipatory struggle. He appeals to the writing of history—or historiography—to cultivate group consciousness of historical memory in order to (1) strengthen intragroup bonds among the racially oppressed, especially black Americans and (2) to create intergroup bonds that reconstruct the republic on the basis of universal ideals. I detail Du Bois’s defense of the black struggle for freedom in the wake of the U.S. Civil War to provide a concrete illustration of ‘spirit’ in American history.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BASWIA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-05-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-05-16

Total views
62 ( #52,240 of 2,448,343 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #9,828 of 2,448,343 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.