Welcome to the Fuzzy-Verse

New Scientist 247 (3298):36-40 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We expect the laws of nature that describe the universe to be exact, but what if that isn't true? In this popular science article, I discuss the possibility that some candidate fundamental laws of nature, such as the Past Hypothesis, may be vague. This possibility is in conflict with the idea that the fundamental laws of nature can always and faithfully be described by classical mathematics. [Bibliographic note: this article is featured on the magazine website under a different title as "The fuzzy law that could break the idea of a mathematical universe" and on the magazine cover as "The Flaw at the Heart of Reality: Why precise mathematical laws can never fully explain the universe." It is a popular version of the article "Nomic Vagueness" that can be found on arXiv: 2006.05298.]

Author's Profile

Eddy Keming Chen
University of California, San Diego


Added to PP

202 (#51,246)

6 months
45 (#46,111)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?