When and Why Understanding Needs Phantasmata: A Moderate Interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the Role of Images in Intellectual Activities

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I examine the passages where Aristotle maintains that intellectual activity employs φαντάσματα (images) and argue that he requires awareness of the relevant images. This, together with Aristotle’s claims about the universality of understanding, gives us reason to reject the interpretation of Michael Wedin and Victor Caston, on which φαντάσματα serve as the material basis for thinking. I develop a new interpretation by unpacking the comparison Aristotle makes to the role of diagrams in doing geometry. In theoretical understanding of mathematical and natural beings, we usually need to employ appropriate φαντάσματα in order to grasp explanatory connections. Aristotle does not, however, commit himself to thinking that images are required for exercising all theoretical understanding. Understanding immaterial things, in particular, may not involve employing phantasmata. Thus the connection that Aristotle makes between images and understanding does not rule out the possibility that human intellectual activity could occur apart from the body.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COHWAW-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-03-30
Latest version: 2 (2016-06-27)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Euclidean Diagram.Manders, Kenneth
The Powers of Aristotle's Soul.Johansen, Thomas Kjeller

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-03-30

Total views
486 ( #8,495 of 50,265 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
86 ( #5,917 of 50,265 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.