Is Rawls' Theory of Justice Biased by Methodological Nationalism?

Dianoia: Rivista di filosofia 2 (33):245-259 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Methodological nationalism assumes that, to understand a phenomenon, nation- states are the relevant units of analysis. This assumption has been recognized as a source of bias in most of the social sciences. Does it bias Rawls' understanding of justice, too? This paper argues that it does for at least two reasons. Firstly, what Rawls thinks justice requires on a global scale falls short of what states and inter- national organisations actually do. Secondly, framing the difference principle in national terms, as Rawls did, is a way to increase the “citizenship rent”, or the revenue a person receives just by being citizen ofa rich country The paper argues that methodological nationalism biases Rawls’ understanding of justice by affecting both the plausibility and the coherence of his theory.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DUMIRT
Upload history
First archival date: 2022-07-24
Latest version: 2 (2022-07-25)
View other versions
Added to PP
2022-07-24

Downloads
435 (#18,569)

6 months
435 (#745)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?