The Case for Absolute Spontaneity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason

Con-Textos Kantianos (6):138-164 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Kant describes the understanding as a faculty of spontaneity. What this means is that our capacity to judge what is true is responsible for its own exercises, which is to say that we issue our judgments for ourselves. To issue our judgments for ourselves is to be self-conscious – i.e., conscious of the grounds upon which we judge. To grasp the spontaneity of the understanding, then, we must grasp the self-consciousness of the understanding. I argue that what Kant requires for explaining spontaneity is a conception of judgment as an intrinsic self-consciousness of the total unity of possible knowledge. This excludes what have been called ‘relative’ accounts of the spontaneity of the understanding, according to which our judgments are issued through a capacity fixed by external conditions. If so, then Kant conceives of understanding as entirely active. Or, to put it another way, he conceives of this capacity as absolutely spontaneous.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Treatise of Human Nature.Hume, David & Lindsay, A. D.
Critique of Pure Reason.Kant, Immanuel & Smith, Norman Kemp

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
118 ( #25,259 of 43,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #28,011 of 43,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.