Fischer's Fate With Fatalism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
John Martin Fischer’s core project in Our Fate (2016) is to develop and defend Pike-style arguments for theological incompatibilism, i. e., for the view that divine omniscience is incompatible with human free will. Against Ockhamist attacks on such arguments, Fischer maintains that divine forebeliefs constitute so-called hard facts about the times at which they occur, or at least facts with hard ‘kernel elements’. I reconstruct Fischer’s argument and outline its structural analogies with an argument for logical fatalism. I then point out some of the costs of Fischer’s reasoning that come into focus once we notice that the set of hard facts is closed under entailment.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JGEFOF
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-04-05
Latest version: 3 (2017-12-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-04-05

Total views
105 ( #24,590 of 41,482 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #24,501 of 41,482 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.