Meaningfulness, the unsaid and translatability. Instead of an introduction

Open Linguistics 1:634-649 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The present paper opens this topical issue on translation techniques by drawing a theoretical basis for the discussion of translational issues in a linguistic perspective. In order to forward an audience- oriented definition of translation, I will describe different forms of linguistic variability, highlighting how they present different difficulties to translators, with an emphasis on the semantic and communicative complexity that a source text can exhibit. The problem is then further discussed through a comparison between Quine's radically holistic position and the translatability principle supported by such semanticists as Katz. General translatability — at the expense of additional complexity — is eventually proposed as a possible synthesis of this debate. In describing the meaningfulness levels of source texts through Hjelmslevian semiotics, and his semiotic hierarchy in particular, the paper attempts to go beyond denotative semiotic, and reframe some translational issues in a connotative semiotic and metasemiotic perspective.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KEIMTU
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-10-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-10-27

Total views
205 ( #30,638 of 64,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #26,375 of 64,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.