Artistic Objectivity: From Ruskin’s ‘Pathetic Fallacy’ to Creative Receptivity

British Journal of Aesthetics:ayaa041 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
While the idea of art as self-expression can sound old-fashioned, it remains widespread—especially if the relevant ‘selves’ can be social collectives, not just individual artists. But self-expression can collapse into individualistic or anthropocentric self-involvement. And compelling successor ideals for artists are not obvious. In this light, I develop a counter-ideal of creative receptivity to basic features of the external world, or artistic objectivity. Objective artists are not trying to express themselves or reach collective self-knowledge. However, they are also not disinterested or emotionless. They can be unmoved by personal feelings and human concerns, but they are still receptive—just attuned to the more elemental forces that creatively inspire them. I elaborate this ideal in dialogue with John Ruskin’s influential critique of the pathetic fallacy. By contextualizing Ruskin’s view vis-à-vis Romantic and Modernist poetics, post-Kantian aesthetics, modern environmental art, and contemporary theories of expressiveness, I show how it indirectly motivates my account.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-03-08
Latest version: 6 (2021-03-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
134 ( #38,728 of 2,448,737 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
89 ( #6,454 of 2,448,737 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.