The Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account of Distinctively Mathematical Explanation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
An account of distinctively mathematical explanation (DME) should satisfy three desiderata: it should account for the modal import of some DMEs; it should distinguish uses of mathematics in explanation that are distinctively mathematical from those that are not (Baron [2016]); and it should also account for the directionality of DMEs (Craver and Povich [2017]). Baron’s (forthcoming) deductive-mathematical account, because it is modelled on the deductive-nomological account, is unlikely to satisfy these desiderata. I provide a counterfactual account of DME, the Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account (NOCA), that can satisfy all three desiderata. NOCA appeals to ontic considerations to account for explanatory asymmetry and ground the relevant counterfactuals. NOCA provides a unification of the causal and the non-causal, the ontic and the modal, by identifying a common core that all explanations share and in virtue of which they are explanatory.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-02-22
Latest version: 2 (2021-05-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
214 ( #28,678 of 2,448,679 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #23,848 of 2,448,679 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.