Recent work on the proof paradox

Philosophy Compass 15 (6):e12667 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent years have seen fresh impetus brought to debates about the proper role of statistical evidence in the law. Recent work largely centres on a set of puzzles known as the ‘proof paradox’. While these puzzles may initially seem academic, they have important ramifications for the law: raising key conceptual questions about legal proof, and practical questions about DNA evidence. This article introduces the proof paradox, why we should care about it, and new work attempting to resolve it.

Author's Profile

Lewis Ross
London School of Economics

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-30

Downloads
1,017 (#10,609)

6 months
229 (#8,064)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?