Perception and the ontology of causation

In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan (eds.), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper argues that the reconciliation of the Causal Theory of Perception with Disjunctivism requires the rejection of causal particularism – the idea that the ontology of causation is always and everywhere an ontology of particulars (e.g., events). The so-called ‘Humean Principle’ that causes must be distinct from their effects is argued to be a genuine barrier to any purported reconciliation, provided causal particularism is retained; but extensive arguments are provided for the rejection of causal particularism. It is then explained how the reconciliation of the causal theory with disjunctivism can proceed on the basis of an ontology of facts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Causal Responsibility and Counterfactuals.Lagnado, David A.; Gerstenberg, Tobias & Zultan, Ro'I.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #43,138 of 46,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #27,265 of 46,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.