Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Mass problems and hyperarithmeticity.Joshua A. Cole & Stephen G. Simpson - 2007 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 7 (2):125-143.
    A mass problem is a set of Turing oracles. If P and Q are mass problems, we say that P is weakly reducible to Q if for all Y ∈ Q there exists X ∈ P such that X is Turing reducible to Y. A weak degree is an equivalence class of mass problems under mutual weak reducibility. Let [Formula: see text] be the lattice of weak degrees of mass problems associated with nonempty [Formula: see text] subsets of the Cantor (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Computational Randomness and Lowness.Sebastiaan Terwijn & Domenico Zambella - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1199-1205.
    We prove that there are uncountably many sets that are low for the class of Schnorr random reals. We give a purely recursion theoretic characterization of these sets and show that they all have Turing degree incomparable to 0'. This contrasts with a result of Kucera and Terwijn [5] on sets that are low for the class of Martin-Lof random reals.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Schnorr Randomness.Rodney G. Downey & Evan J. Griffiths - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):533 - 554.
    Schnorr randomness is a notion of algorithmic randomness for real numbers closely related to Martin-Löf randomness. After its initial development in the 1970s the notion received considerably less attention than Martin-Löf randomness, but recently interest has increased in a range of randomness concepts. In this article, we explore the properties of Schnorr random reals, and in particular the c.e. Schnorr random reals. We show that there are c.e. reals that are Schnorr random but not Martin-Löf random, and provide a new (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Lowness for the class of random sets.Antonín Kučera & Sebastiaan A. Terwijn - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1396-1402.
    A positive answer to a question of M. van Lambalgen and D. Zambella whether there exist nonrecursive sets that are low for the class of random sets is obtained. Here a set A is low for the class RAND of random sets if RAND = RAND A.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Randomness, Lowness and Degrees.George Barmpalias, Andrew E. M. Lewis & Mariya Soskova - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):559 - 577.
    We say that A ≤LR B if every B-random number is A-random. Intuitively this means that if oracle A can identify some patterns on some real γ. In other words. B is at least as good as A for this purpose. We study the structure of the LR degrees globally and locally (i.e., restricted to the computably enumberable degrees) and their relationship with the Turing degrees. Among other results we show that whenever α in not GL₂ the LR degree of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Lowness and Π₂⁰ nullsets.Rod Downey, Andre Nies, Rebecca Weber & Liang Yu - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):1044-1052.
    We prove that there exists a noncomputable c.e. real which is low for weak 2-randomness, a definition of randomness due to Kurtz, and that all reals which are low for weak 2-randomness are low for Martin-Löf randomness.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Computability and Randomness.André Nies - 2008 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
    The interplay between computability and randomness has been an active area of research in recent years, reflected by ample funding in the USA, numerous workshops, and publications on the subject. The complexity and the randomness aspect of a set of natural numbers are closely related. Traditionally, computability theory is concerned with the complexity aspect. However, computability theoretic tools can also be used to introduce mathematical counterparts for the intuitive notion of randomness of a set. Recent research shows that, conversely, concepts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Lowness for Kurtz randomness.Noam Greenberg & Joseph S. Miller - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):665-678.
    We prove that degrees that are low for Kurtz randomness cannot be diagonally non-recursive. Together with the work of Stephan and Yu [16], this proves that they coincide with the hyperimmune-free non-DNR degrees, which are also exactly the degrees that are low for weak 1-genericity. We also consider Low(M, Kurtz), the class of degrees a such that every element of M is a-Kurtz random. These are characterised when M is the class of Martin-Löf random, computably random, or Schnorr random reals. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Computational randomness and lowness.Sebastiaan A. Terwijn & Domenico Zambella - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1199-1205.
    We prove that there are uncountably many sets that are low for the class of Schnorr random reals. We give a purely recursion theoretic characterization of these sets and show that they all have Turing degree incomparable to 0'. This contrasts with a result of Kučera and Terwijn [5] on sets that are low for the class of Martin-Löf random reals.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Lowness for the class of Schnorr random sets.B. Kjös-Hanssen, A. Nies & F. Stephan - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (3):647-657.
    We answer a question of Ambos-Spies and Kuˇcera in the affirmative. They asked whether, when a real is low for Schnorr randomness, it is already low for Schnorr tests.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations