Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A microscopic approach to Souslin-tree constructions, Part I.Ari Meir Brodsky & Assaf Rinot - 2017 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 168 (11):1949-2007.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals.F. R. Drake & T. J. Jech - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):187-191.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy.R. Björn Jensen - 1972 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (3):229.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   269 citations  
  • Introduction to Set Theory.K. Hrbacek & T. Jech - 2001 - Studia Logica 69 (3):448-449.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • On the History of Souslin's Problem.Carlos Alvarez - 1999 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 54 (3):181-242.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Souslin trees at successors of regular cardinals.Assaf Rinot - 2019 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 65 (2):200-204.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • More Notions of Forcing Add a Souslin Tree.Ari Meir Brodsky & Assaf Rinot - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (3):437-455.
    An ℵ1-Souslin tree is a complicated combinatorial object whose existence cannot be decided on the grounds of ZFC alone. But fifteen years after Tennenbaum and Jech independently devised notions of forcing for introducing such a tree, Shelah proved that already the simplest forcing notion—Cohen forcing—adds an ℵ1-Souslin tree. In this article, we identify a rather large class of notions of forcing that, assuming a GCH-type hypothesis, add a λ+-Souslin tree. This class includes Prikry, Magidor, and Radin forcing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Squares, ascent paths, and chain conditions.Chris Lambie-Hanson & Philipp Lücke - 2018 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (4):1512-1538.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Squares and narrow systems.Chris Lambie-Hanson - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (3):834-859.
    A narrow system is a combinatorial object introduced by Magidor and Shelah in connection with work on the tree property at successors of singular cardinals. In analogy to the tree property, a cardinalκsatisfies thenarrow system propertyif every narrow system of heightκhas a cofinal branch. In this paper, we study connections between the narrow system property, square principles, and forcing axioms. We prove, assuming large cardinals, both that it is consistent that ℵω+1satisfies the narrow system property and$\square _{\aleph _\omega, < \aleph (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Aronszajn trees, square principles, and stationary reflection.Chris Lambie-Hanson - 2017 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 63 (3-4):265-281.
    We investigate questions involving Aronszajn trees, square principles, and stationary reflection. We first consider two strengthenings of introduced by Brodsky and Rinot for the purpose of constructing κ‐Souslin trees. Answering a question of Rinot, we prove that the weaker of these strengthenings is compatible with stationary reflection at κ but the stronger is not. We then prove that, if μ is a singular cardinal, implies the existence of a special ‐tree with a cf(μ)‐ascent path, thus answering a question of Lücke.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Higher Souslin trees and the generalized continuum hypothesis.John Gregory - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (3):663-671.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • An variation for one souslin tree.Paul Larson - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):81-98.
    We present a variation of the forcing S max as presented in Woodin [4]. Our forcing is a P max -style construction where each model condition selects one Souslin tree. In the extension there is a Souslin tree T G which is the direct limit of the selected Souslin trees in the models of the generic. In some sense, the generic extension is a maximal model of "there exists a minimal Souslin tree," with T G being this minimal tree. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Constructibility.Keith J. Devlin - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):864-867.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • A Δ< sup> 2< sub> 2 well-order of the reals and incompactness of< i> L(< i> QMM).Uri Abraham & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 59 (1):1-32.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Canonical models for ℵ1-combinatorics.Saharon Shelah & Jindr̆ich Zapletal - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 98 (1-3):217-259.
    We define the property of Π2-compactness of a statement Φ of set theory, meaning roughly that the hard core of the impact of Φ on combinatorics of 1 can be isolated in a canonical model for the statement Φ. We show that the following statements are Π2-compact: “dominating NUMBER = 1,” “cofinality of the meager IDEAL = 1”, “cofinality of the null IDEAL = 1”, “bounding NUMBER = 1”, existence of various types of Souslin trees and variations on uniformity of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • A Δ22 well-order of the reals and incompactness of L.Uri Abraham & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 59 (1):1-32.
    A forcing poset of size 221 which adds no new reals is described and shown to provide a Δ22 definable well-order of the reals . The encoding of this well-order is obtained by playing with products of Aronszajn trees: some products are special while other are Suslin trees. The paper also deals with the Magidor–Malitz logic: it is consistent that this logic is highly noncompact.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Souslin trees and successors of singular cardinals.Shai Ben-David & Saharon Shelah - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30 (3):207-217.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • μ-complete Souslin trees on μ+.Menachem Kojman & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (3):195-201.
    We prove thatµ=µ <µ , 2 µ =µ + and “there is a non-reflecting stationary subset ofµ + composed of ordinals of cofinality <μ” imply that there is a μ-complete Souslin tree onµ +.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On guessing generalized clubs at the successors of regulars.Assaf Rinot - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (7):566-577.
    König, Larson and Yoshinobu initiated the study of principles for guessing generalized clubs, and introduced a construction of a higher Souslin tree from the strong guessing principle.Complementary to the author’s work on the validity of diamond and non-saturation at the successor of singulars, we deal here with a successor of regulars. It is established that even the non-strong guessing principle entails non-saturation, and that, assuming the necessary cardinal arithmetic configuration, entails a diamond-type principle which suffices for the construction of a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory.Leo Harrington & Saharon Shelah - 1985 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (2):178-188.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Jensen's □ principles and the Novak number of partially ordered sets.Boban Veličković - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):47-58.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations