Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The real core model and its scales.Daniel W. Cunningham - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 72 (3):213-289.
    This paper introduces the real core model K() and determines the extent of scales in this inner model. K() is an analog of Dodd-Jensen's core model K and contains L(), the smallest inner model of ZF containing the reals R. We define iterable real premice and show that Σ1∩() has the scale property when vR AD. We then prove the following Main Theorem: ZF + AD + V = K() DC. Thus, we obtain the Corollary: If ZF + AD +()L() (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • A covering lemma for L(ℝ).Daniel W. Cunningham - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (1):49-54.
    Jensen's celebrated Covering Lemma states that if 0# does not exist, then for any uncountable set of ordinals X, there is a Y∈L such that X⊆Y and |X| = |Y|. Working in ZF + AD alone, we establish the following analog: If ℝ# does not exist, then L(ℝ) and V have exactly the same sets of reals and for any set of ordinals X with |X| ≥ΘL(ℝ), there is a Y∈L(ℝ) such that X⊆Y and |X| = |Y|. Here ℝ is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The axiom of determinancy implies dependent choices in l(r).Alexander S. Kechris - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):161 - 173.
    We prove the following Main Theorem: $ZF + AD + V = L(R) \Rightarrow DC$ . As a corollary we have that $\operatorname{Con}(ZF + AD) \Rightarrow \operatorname{Con}(ZF + AD + DC)$ . Combined with the result of Woodin that $\operatorname{Con}(ZF + AD) \Rightarrow \operatorname{Con}(ZF + AD + \neg AC^\omega)$ it follows that DC (as well as AC ω ) is independent relative to ZF + AD. It is finally shown (jointly with H. Woodin) that ZF + AD + ¬ DC (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (1 other version)The core model.A. Dodd & R. Jensen - 1981 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 20 (1):43-75.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  • Is there a set of reals not in K(R)?Daniel W. Cunningham - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92 (2):161-210.
    We show, using the fine structure of K, that the theory ZF + AD + X R[X K] implies the existence of an inner model of ZF + AD + DC containing a measurable cardinal above its Θ, the supremum of the ordinals which are the surjective image of R. As a corollary, we show that HODK = K for some P K where K is the Dodd-Jensen Core Model relative to P. In conclusion, we show that the theory ZF (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Higher Infinite.Akihiro Kanamori - 2000 - Studia Logica 65 (3):443-446.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   212 citations  
  • Descriptive Set Theory.Yiannis Nicholas Moschovakis - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (4):429-430.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   162 citations  
  • [Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
    Reviewed Works:John R. Steel, A. S. Kechris, D. A. Martin, Y. N. Moschovakis, Scales on $\Sigma^1_1$ Sets.Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Scales on Coinductive Sets.Donald A. Martin, John R. Steel, The Extent of Scales in $L$.John R. Steel, Scales in $L$.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   219 citations  
  • (1 other version)[Omnibus Review].Akihiro Kanamori - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):864-866.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations