Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Language Evolution: Constraints and Opportunities From Modern Genetics.Dan Dediu & Morten H. Christiansen - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (2):361-370.
    Our understanding of language, its origins and subsequent evolution, is shaped not only by data and theories from the language sciences, but also fundamentally by the biological sciences. Recent developments in genetics and evolutionary theory offer both very strong constraints on what scenarios of language evolution are possible and probable, but also offer exciting opportunities for understanding otherwise puzzling phenomena. Due to the intrinsic breathtaking rate of advancement in these fields, and the complexity, subtlety, and sometimes apparent non-intuitiveness of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:e62.
    Memory is fleeting. New material rapidly obliterates previous material. How, then, can the brain deal successfully with the continual deluge of linguistic input? We argue that, to deal with this “Now-or-Never” bottleneck, the brain must compress and recode linguistic input as rapidly as possible. This observation has strong implications for the nature of language processing: (1) the language system must “eagerly” recode and compress linguistic input; (2) as the bottleneck recurs at each new representational level, the language system must build (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  • Language as shaped by the brain.Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):489-509.
    It is widely assumed that human learning and the structure of human languages are intimately related. This relationship is frequently suggested to derive from a language-specific biological endowment, which encodes universal, but communicatively arbitrary, principles of language structure (a Universal Grammar or UG). How might such a UG have evolved? We argue that UG could not have arisen either by biological adaptation or non-adaptationist genetic processes, resulting in a logical problem of language evolution. Specifically, as the processes of language change (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   145 citations  
  • Fast mapping, slow learning: Disambiguation of novel word–object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30months. [REVIEW]Ricardo Ah Bion, Arielle Borovsky & Anne Fernald - 2013 - Cognition 126 (1):39-53.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • The Co‐evolution of Speech and the Lexicon: The Interaction of Functional Pressures, Redundancy, and Category Variation.Bodo Winter & Andrew Wedel - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (2):503-513.
    The sound system of a language must be able to support a perceptual contrast between different words in order to signal communicatively relevant meaning distinctions. In this paper, we use a simple agent-based exemplar model in which the evolution of sound-category systems is understood as a co-evolutionary process, where the range of variation within sound categories is constrained by functional pressure to keep different words perceptually distinct. We show that this model can reproduce several observed effects on the range of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations.Sandra R. Waxman & Susan A. Gelman - 2009 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (6):258-263.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: A parallel to human word learning?Edward A. Wasserman, Daniel I. Brooks & Bob McMurray - 2015 - Cognition 136 (C):99-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition.Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne & Henrike Moll - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):675-691.
    We propose that the crucial difference between human cognition and that of other species is the ability to participate with others in collaborative activities with shared goals and intentions: shared intentionality. Participation in such activities requires not only especially powerful forms of intention reading and cultural learning, but also a unique motivation to share psychological states with others and unique forms of cognitive representation for doing so. The result of participating in these activities is species-unique forms of cultural cognition and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   509 citations  
  • Core knowledge.Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2000 - American Psychologist 55 (11):1233-1243.
    Complex cognitive skills such as reading and calculation and complex cognitive achievements such as formal science and mathematics may depend on a set of building block systems that emerge early in human ontogeny and phylogeny. These core knowledge systems show characteristic limits of domain and task specificity: Each serves to represent a particular class of entities for a particular set of purposes. By combining representations from these systems, however human cognition may achieve extraordinary flexibility. Studies of cognition in human infants (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   208 citations  
  • Natural selection and natural language.Steven Pinker & Paul Bloom - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):707-784.
    Many people have argued that the evolution of the human language faculty cannot be explained by Darwinian natural selection. Chomsky and Gould have suggested that language may have evolved as the by-product of selection for other abilities or as a consequence of as-yet unknown laws of growth and form. Others have argued that a biological specialization for grammar is incompatible with every tenet of Darwinian theory – that it shows no genetic variation, could not exist in any intermediate forms, confers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   411 citations  
  • Natural language and natural selection.Steven Pinker & Paul Bloom - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):707-27.
    Many people have argued that the evolution of the human language faculty cannot be explained by Darwinian natural selection. Chomsky and Gould have suggested that language may have evolved as the by-product of selection for other abilities or as a consequence of as-yet unknown laws of growth and form. Others have argued that a biological specialization for grammar is incompatible with every tenet of Darwinian theory – that it shows no genetic variation, could not exist in any intermediate forms, confers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   598 citations  
  • What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.Bob McMurray & Allard Jongman - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (2):219-246.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning.Bob McMurray, Jessica S. Horst & Larissa K. Samuelson - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (4):831-877.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  • Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: Enhancing development or an unintended consequence?Bob McMurray, Kristine A. Kovack-Lesh, Dresden Goodwin & William McEchron - 2013 - Cognition 129 (2):362-378.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Phonetic details in perception and production allow various patterns in phonological change.Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker & LouAnn Gerken - 2002 - Cognition 82 (3):B101-B111.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker & LouAnn Gerken - 2002 - Cognition 82 (3):B101-B111.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   133 citations  
  • Genes, interactions, and the development of behavior.Timothy D. Johnston & Laura Edwards - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (1):26-34.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • What's New? Children Prefer Novelty in Referent Selection.Bob McMurray Jessica S. Horst, Larissa K. Samuelson, Sarah C. Kucker - 2011 - Cognition 118 (2):234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition: A Probabilistic Perspective.Anne S. Hsu & Nick Chater - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (6):972-1016.
    Natural language is full of patterns that appear to fit with general linguistic rules but are ungrammatical. There has been much debate over how children acquire these “linguistic restrictions,” and whether innate language knowledge is needed. Recently, it has been shown that restrictions in language can be learned asymptotically via probabilistic inference using the minimum description length (MDL) principle. Here, we extend the MDL approach to give a simple and practical methodology for estimating how much linguistic data are required to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • What’s new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection.Jessica S. Horst, Larissa K. Samuelson, Sarah C. Kucker & Bob McMurray - 2011 - Cognition 118 (2):234-244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Finding Structure in Time.Jeffrey L. Elman - 1990 - Cognitive Science 14 (2):179-211.
    Time underlies many interesting human behaviors. Thus, the question of how to represent time in connectionist models is very important. One approach is to represent time implicitly by its effects on processing rather than explicitly (as in a spatial representation). The current report develops a proposal along these lines first described by Jordan (1986) which involves the use of recurrent links in order to provide networks with a dynamic memory. In this approach, hidden unit patterns are fed back to themselves: (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   506 citations  
  • Core knowledge.Elizabeth S. Spelke & Katherine D. Kinzler - 2007 - Developmental Science 10 (1):89-96.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   141 citations