Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A Deterministic Terminating Sequent Calculus For Gödel-dummett Logic.R. Dyckhoff - 1999 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 7 (3):319-326.
    We give a short proof-theoretic treatment of a terminating contraction-free calculus G4-LC for the zero-order Gödel-Dummett logic LC. This calculus is a slight variant of a calculus given by Avellone et al, who show its completeness by model-theoretic techniques. In our calculus, all the rules of G4-LC are invertible, thus allowing a deterministic proof-search procedure.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Proof-theoretical analysis of order relations.Sara Negri, Jan von Plato & Thierry Coquand - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (3):297-309.
    A proof-theoretical analysis of elementary theories of order relations is effected through the formulation of order axioms as mathematical rules added to contraction-free sequent calculus. Among the results obtained are proof-theoretical formulations of conservativity theorems corresponding to Szpilrajn’s theorem on the extension of a partial order into a linear one. Decidability of the theories of partial and linear order for quantifier-free sequents is shown by giving terminating methods of proof-search.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Basic proof theory.A. S. Troelstra - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Helmut Schwichtenberg.
    This introduction to the basic ideas of structural proof theory contains a thorough discussion and comparison of various types of formalization of first-order logic. Examples are given of several areas of application, namely: the metamathematics of pure first-order logic (intuitionistic as well as classical); the theory of logic programming; category theory; modal logic; linear logic; first-order arithmetic and second-order logic. In each case the aim is to illustrate the methods in relatively simple situations and then apply them elsewhere in much (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   159 citations  
  • (1 other version)The finite model property for various fragments of intuitionistic linear logic.Mitsuhiro Okada & Kazushige Terui - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):790-802.
    Recently Lafont [6] showed the finite model property for the multiplicative additive fragment of linear logic (MALL) and for affine logic (LLW), i.e., linear logic with weakening. In this paper, we shall prove the finite model property for intuitionistic versions of those, i.e. intuitionistic MALL (which we call IMALL), and intuitionistic LLW (which we call ILLW). In addition, we shall show the finite model property for contractive linear logic (LLC), i.e., linear logic with contraction, and for its intuitionistic version (ILLC). (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Contraction-free sequent calculi for intuitionistic logic.Roy Dyckhoff - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):795-807.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • Decomposition proof systems for gödel-Dummett logics.Arnon Avron & Beata Konikowska - 2001 - Studia Logica 69 (2):197-219.
    The main goal of the paper is to suggest some analytic proof systems for LC and its finite-valued counterparts which are suitable for proof-search. This goal is achieved through following the general Rasiowa-Sikorski methodology for constructing analytic proof systems for semantically-defined logics. All the systems presented here are terminating, contraction-free, and based on invertible rules, which have a local character and at most two premises.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Skolem's discovery of gödel-Dummett logic.Jan von Plato - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (1):153 - 157.
    Attention is drawn to the fact that what is alternatively known as Dummett logic, Gödel logic, or Gödel-Dummett logic, was actually introduced by Skolem already in 1913. A related work of 1919 introduces implicative lattices, or Heyting algebras in today's terminology.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Logics without the contraction rule.Hiroakira Ono & Yuichi Komori - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1):169-201.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   91 citations  
  • Logic with truth values in a linearly ordered Heyting algebra.Alfred Horn - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):395-408.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Jan von Plato and Sara Negri, Structural Proof Theory. [REVIEW]Harold T. Hodes - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (2):255-258.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • A propositional calculus with denumerable matrix.Michael Dummett - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (2):97-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   110 citations  
  • Duplication-free tableau calculi and related cut-free sequent calculi for the interpolable propositional intermediate logics.A. Avellone, M. Ferrari & P. Miglioli - 1999 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 7 (4):447-480.
    We get cut-free sequent calculi for the interpolable propositional intermediate logics by translating suitable duplication-free tableau calculi developed within a semantical framework. From this point of view, the paper also provides semantical proofs of the admissibility of the cut-rule for appropriate cut-free sequent calculi.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (1 other version)Skolem's Discovery of Gödel-Dummett Logic.Jan von Plato - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (1):153-157.
    Attention is drawn to the fact that what is alternatively known as Dummett logic, Gödel logic, or Gödel-Dummett logic, was actually introduced by Skolem already in 1913. A related work of 1919 introduces implicative lattices, or Heyting algebras in today's terminology.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Finite Model Property for Various Fragments of Intuitionistic Linear Logic.Mitsuhiro Okada & Kazushige Terui - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):790-802.
    Recently Lafont [6] showed the finite model property for the multiplicative additive fragment of linear logic and for affine logic, i.e., linear logic with weakening. In this paper, we shall prove the finite model property for intuitionistic versions of those, i.e. intuitionistic MALL, and intuitionistic LLW. In addition, we shall show the finite model property for contractive linear logic, i.e., linear logic with contraction, and for its intuitionistic version. The finite model property for related substructural logics also follow by our (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Semantic trees for Dummett's logic LC.Giovanna Corsi - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (2):199-206.
    The aim of this paper is to provide a decision procedure for Dummett's logic LC, such that with any given formula will be associated either a proof in a sequent calculus equivalent to LC or a finite linear Kripke countermodel.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations