- How Fascism Works. The Politics of Us and Them.Jason Stanley - 2015 - New York USA: Random House.details
|
|
(1 other version)Introduction: An Overview of Trust and Some Key Epistemological Applications.Katherine Dormandy - 2019 - In Trust in Epistemology. New York: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1-40.details
|
|
The Enigma of Reason.Dan Sperber & Hugo Mercier (eds.) - 2017 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.details
|
|
Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Thi Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.details
|
|
Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs.Line Edslev Andersen - 2020 - Synthese 197 (1):233-247.details
|
|
(3 other versions)Social Epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 1999 - Critica 31 (93):3-19.details
|
|
(1 other version)Trust, Distrust and Commitment.Katherine Hawley - 2012 - Noûs 48 (1):1-20.details
|
|
A Bayesian Simulation Model of Group Deliberation and Polarization.Erik J. Olsson - 2013 - Springer.details
|
|
Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs.Gregor Betz - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
(1 other version)Trust, Distrust and Commitment.Katherine Hawley - 2014 - Noûs 48 (1):1-20.details
|
|
The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary.José Medina - 2011 - Social Epistemology 25 (1):15-35.details
|
|
Why argue? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation.Cristiano Castelfranchi & Fabio Paglieri - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):71-91.details
|
|
Probabilistic proofs and transferability.Kenny Easwaran - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (3):341-362.details
|
|
Norms of assertion.Jennifer Lackey - 2007 - Noûs 41 (4):594–626.details
|
|
Argumentation and social epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):27-49.details
|
|
Understanding and the facts.Catherine Elgin - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (1):33 - 42.details
|
|
Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert Brandom - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.details
|
|
Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in its Place.Robert B. Talisse - 2019 - New York: Oup Usa.details
|
|
Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives.David M. Messick & Karen S. Cook - 1983 - Greenwood.details
|
|
Disagreement about Disagreement? What Disagreement about Disagreement?Alex Worsnip - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14.details
|
|
Argumentative Injustice.Patrick Bondy - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):263-278.details
|
|
Epistemic Vigilance.Dan Sperber, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi & Deirdre Wilson - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (4):359-393.details
|
|
How to Be Trustworthy.Katherine Hawley - 2019 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Argument is War... And War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation.Daniel H. Cohen - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2):177-188.details
|
|
Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.details
|
|
(3 other versions)Social epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Locke on testimony.Mark Boespflug - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (6):1135-1150.details
|
|
Group Problem Solving.Patrick R. Laughlin - 2011 - Princeton University Press.details
|
|
Argumentation and Interpersonal Justification.Alvin I. Goldman - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (2):155-164.details
|
|
Proofs and refutations (IV).I. Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (56):296-342.details
|
|
An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation.Alvin I. Goldman - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (1):51-63.details
|
|
(1 other version)Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs (2006).Charles S. Taber & Milton Lodge - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (2):157-184.details
|
|
Proofs and refutations (III).Imre Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (55):221-245.details
|
|