View topic on PhilPapers for more information
Related categories

11 found
Order:
More results on PhilPapers
  1. Aristotle on “dunatos” as a label for imperfect syllogisms.Lucas Angioni - forthcoming - In Graziana Ciola & Milo Crimi (eds.), Validity Throughout History. Munich, Germany:
    This paper discusses the following question: why was the term “dunatos” (“possible”) employed by Aristotle as an alternative label for imperfect syllogisms in his discussion of assertoric syllogistic? My answer ascribes to Aristotle a bottom up perspective, in which he stresses what is necessary in the premise-pairs to attain target conclusions of a given form within a given figure. I argue that “dunatos” is employed by Aristotle to stress that an imperfect syllogism is always one of the possible options to (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Os métodos de prova nos Primeiros Analíticos de Aristóteles e sua natureza normativa.Ralph Leal Heck - 2020 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 65 (3):1-13.
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic. [REVIEW]Lucas Angioni - 2018 - Ancient Philosophy 38 (1):211-216.
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4. Demonstração, silogismo e causalidade.Lucas Angioni - 2014 - In Lógica e Ciência em Aristóteles. pp. 61-120.
    This chapter argues in favour of three interrelated points. First, I argue that demonstration (as expression of scientific knowledge) is fundamentally defined as knowledge of the appropriate cause for a given explanandum: to have scientific knowledge of the explanandum is to explain it through its fully appropriate cause. Secondly, I stress that Aristotle’s notion of cause has a “triadic” structure, which fundamentally depends on the predicative formulation (or “regimentation”) of the explanandum. Thirdly, I argue that what has motivated Aristotle to (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  5. Lógica e Ciência em Aristóteles.Lucas Angioni - 2014 - Phi.
    Collective volume with papers by alumni and students from the Campinas Aristotle Group.
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  6. A Cláusula Final da Definição Geral do Silogismo e suas funções na silogística e nos Primeiros Analíticos I de Aristóteles.Felipe Weinmann - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Campinas
    Aristotle's General Definition of the Syllogism may be taken as consisting of two parts: the Inferential Conditions and the Final Clause. Although this distinction is well known, traditional interpretations neglect the Final Clause and its influence on syllogistic. Instead, the aforementioned tradition focuses on the Inferential Conditions only. We intend to show that this neglect has severe consequences not just on syllogistic but on the whole exegesis of Aristotle's Prior Analytics I. Due to these consequences, our objective is to analyse (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. O escopo do 'toi tauta einai' na silogística aristotélica.Felipe Weinmann - 2014 - Intuitio 7 (1):43-66.
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Necessidade, mediação e o papel do 'toi tauta einai' nos Primeiros Analíticos I.4 e I.7 de Aristóteles.Felipe Weinmann - 2013 - Revista Do Seminário Dos Alunos Do PPGLM/UFRJ 4 (1):70-87.
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. A LÓGICA DE ARISTÓTELES: PROBLEMAS INTERPRETATIVOS E ABORDAGENS CONTEMPORÂNEAS DOS PRIMEIROS ANALÍTICOS.Mateus Ricardo Fernandes Ferreira - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Campinas
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10. Aristotle's logic at the university of buffalo's department of philosophy.John Corcoran - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (140):99-117.
    We begin with an introductory overview of contributions made by more than twenty scholars associated with the Philosophy Department at the University of Buffalo during the last half-century to our understanding and evaluation of Aristotle's logic. More well-known developments are merely mentioned in..
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Warum fehlt bei Aristoteles die 4. Figur?Theodor Ebert - 1980 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1):13-31.
    The reason for Aristotle’s treatment of (traditional) fourth figure syllogisms as first figure syllogisms with inverted terms in the conclusion is the following: To disprove the conclusiveness of a premiss pair Aristotle formulates two triplets of true propositions such that two of them correspond to the premiss pair in question and that the third proposition corresponding to a conclusion is an a-proposition in the first case, an e-proposition in the other. Since the truth of an a-proposition grants the falsity of (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation