- Aimless science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1211-1221.details
|
|
Toward openness and fairness in the review process.Byron P. Rourke - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):161-161.details
|
|
Some indices of the reliability of peer review.Robert Rosenthal - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):160-161.details
|
|
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?Henry L. Roediger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):159-160.details
|
|
Naturalism radicalized.Javier Rodríguez-alcázar - 1996 - Metaphilosophy 27 (4):356-380.details
|
|
Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem.David B. Resnik & Kevin C. Elliott - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (2):259-286.details
|
|
Are methodological rules hypothetical imperatives?David B. Resnik - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):498-507.details
|
|
Rethinking science and values.Hans Radder - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):107 – 114.details
|
|
How Inclusive Is European Philosophy of Science?Hans Radder - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):149-165.details
|
|
Goals shape means: a pluralist response to the problem of formal representation in ontic structural realism.Agnieszka M. Proszewska - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-21.details
|
|
The Distinction Between Epistemic and Non-Epistemic Values in the Natural Sciences.Maria Pournari - 2008 - Science & Education 17 (6):669-676.details
|
|
A Critique of the Constitutive Role of Truthlikeness in the Similarity Approach.Carlotta Piscopo & Mauro Birattari - 2010 - Erkenntnis 72 (3):379-386.details
|
|
The proof of the pudding: Yafeng Shan: Doing integrated history and philosophy of science: a case study of the origin of genetics. Cham: Springer, 2020. ix + 197 pp, €84.79 PB, €67.40 e-book. [REVIEW]Charles H. Pence - 2022 - Metascience 31 (2):179-181.details
|
|
‘‘Describing our whole experience’’: The statistical philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson.Charles H. Pence - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):475-485.details
|
|
A socio‐epistemological program for the philosophy of regulatory science.Guillermo Marín Penella - 2023 - Metaphilosophy 54 (4):480-492.details
|
|
Verisimilitude: a causal approach.Robert Northcott - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1471-1488.details
|
|
Measuring the Success of Science.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (1):434-445.details
|
|
Defending abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):451.details
|
|
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.Linda D. Nelson - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):158-159.details
|
|
Virtues of ‘values’ and ‘virtues’: on theoretical virtues and the aim of science.Mousa Mohammadian - 2022 - Metascience 31 (3):297-302.details
|
|
Abduction − the context of discovery + underdetermination = inference to the best explanation.Mousa Mohammadian - 2021 - Synthese 198 (5):4205-4228.details
|
|
What is Scientific Progress? Lessons from Scientific Practice.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (2):375-390.details
|
|
What’s so bad about scientism?Moti Mizrahi - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (4):351-367.details
|
|
The Argument from Underconsideration and Relative Realism.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):393-407.details
|
|
Normativity of Scientific Laws : Aspects of Implicit Normativity.Ave Mets - 2018 - Problemos 94:49.details
|
|
Knowledge for the good of the individual and society: linking philosophy, disciplinary goals, theory, and practice.Mary K. McCurry, Susan M. Hunter Revell & Callista Roy Sr - 2010 - Nursing Philosophy 11 (1):42-52.details
|
|
Reflections on the peer review process.Herbert W. Marsh & Samuel Ball - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-158.details
|
|
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.Michael J. Mahoney - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-157.details
|
|
Should the blinded lead the blinded?Stephen P. Lock - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):156-157.details
|
|
The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism.Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook & Elisabeth Lloyd - 2018 - Synthese 195 (1):175-196.details
|
|
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?Donald Laming - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):154-156.details
|
|
Scientific Realism Again.James Ladyman - 2018 - Spontaneous Generations 9 (1):99-107.details
|
|
Autonomy and Objectivity of Science.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):309-334.details
|
|
Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?Helena Chmura Kraemer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):152-154.details
|
|
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.Charles A. Kiesler - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):151-152.details
|
|
Social constructivism and the aims of science.Kareem Khalifa - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (1):45 – 61.details
|
|
Default privilege and bad lots: Underconsideration and explanatory inference.Kareem Khalifa - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):91 – 105.details
|
|
From Aperspectival Objectivity to Strong Objectivity: The Quest for Moral Objectivity.Jennifer Tannoch-Bland - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (1):155 - 178.details
|
|
An Epistemic Version of Pascal's Wager.Elizabeth Jackson - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-17.details
|
|
Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.details
|
|
On Rationales for Cognitive Values in the Assessment of Scientific Representations.Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):319-331.details
|
|
Is there an alternative to peer review?Richard Greene - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-150.details
|
|
Replication, reliability and peer review: A case study.Michael E. Gorman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-149.details
|
|
On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.J. Barnard Gilmore - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):148-149.details
|
|
Philosophy of science naturalized.Ronald N. Giere - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):331-356.details
|
|
Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.Steve Fuller - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):147-148.details
|
|
Journal availability and the quality of published research.Jack M. Fletcher - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):146-147.details
|
|
Judgment and Reasoning in the Evaluation of Theories.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1986 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986 (1):227-235.details
|
|
Divided by Language, but United in the Imagination?Yiftach Fehige - 2022 - Sophia 61 (1):61-77.details
|
|
Understanding and scientific progress: lessons from epistemology.Nicholas Emmerson - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-18.details
|
|