- Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel H. Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.details
|
|
Optimism in unconscious, intuitive morality.Cory J. Clark & Bo M. Winegard - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42:e150.details
|
|
Research on Consumer Purchasing Channel Choice Based on Product Tolerance: The Mediating Role of Rationalization.Jinsong Chen, Yumin Wu & Xue Jiang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.details
|
|
The paradox of social interaction: Shared intentionality, we-reasoning, and virtual bargaining.Nick Chater, Hossam Zeitoun & Tigran Melkonyan - 2022 - Psychological Review 129 (3):415-437.details
|
|
The enigma is not entirely dispelled: A review of Mercier and Sperber's The Enigma of Reason. [REVIEW]Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2018 - Mind and Language 33 (5):525-532.details
|
|
Human Life Is Group Life: Deliberative Democracy for Realists.Simone Chambers - 2018 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 30 (1-2):36-48.details
|
|
Argumentation and the problem of agreement.John Casey & Scott F. Aikin - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-23.details
|
|
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement.Diego Castro - 2021 - Informal Logic 41 (2):245-280.details
|
|
Independent effects of relevance and arousal on deductive reasoning.Serge Caparos & Isabelle Blanchette - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (5):1012-1022.details
|
|
Judgments of taste as strategic moves in a coordination game.Filip Buekens - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.details
|
|
Undoing the past in order to lie in the present: Counterfactual thinking and deceptive communication.Raluca A. Briazu, Clare R. Walsh, Catherine Deeprose & Giorgio Ganis - 2017 - Cognition 161:66-73.details
|
|
Liberals and conservatives can show similarities in negativity bias.Mark J. Brandt, Geoffrey Wetherell & Christine Reyna - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):307-308.details
|
|
Pragmatic Encroachment and Epistemically Responsible Action.Kenneth Boyd - 2016 - Synthese 193 (9).details
|
|
What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience.Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (8):1177-1198.details
|
|
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life.Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.details
|
|
Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological defence of human rationality.Maarten Boudry, Michael Vlerick & Ryan McKay - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:524-535.details
|
|
Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength.Gustavo A. Bodanza & Esteban Freidin - 2023 - Argument and Computation 14 (3):247-273.details
|
|
Modular vs. diagrammatic reasoning.Angelina Bobrova & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2022 - Pragmatics and Cognition 29 (1):111-134.details
|
|
Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience.Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry & Massimo Pigliucci - 2016 - Theoria 83 (1):78-97.details
|
|
Science as a moral system.Stefaan Blancke - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-18.details
|
|
Reasonable Irrationality: the Role of Reasons in the Diffusion of Pseudoscience.Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry & Johan Braeckman - 2019 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 19 (5):432-449.details
|
|
Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem.Stefaan Blancke & Maarten Boudry - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):183-198.details
|
|
Nothing about collective irrationalities makes sense except in the light of cooperation.Stefaan Blancke - 2023 - Philosophical Psychology 36 (5):990-1010.details
|
|
In defence of epistemic vices.Steven Bland - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Cognitive bias, situationism, and virtue reliabilism.Steven Bland - 2018 - Synthese 198 (1):471-490.details
|
|
An Interactionist Approach to Cognitive Debiasing.Steven Bland - 2022 - Episteme 19 (1):66-88.details
|
|
Self-serving biases and public justifications in trust games.Cristina Bicchieri & Hugo Mercier - 2013 - Synthese 190 (5):909-922.details
|
|
Norm manipulation, Norm evasion: Experimental evidence.Cristina Bicchieri & Alex K. Chavez - 2013 - Economics and Philosophy 29 (2):175-198.details
|
|
No Epistemic Norm or Aim Needed.Marianna Bergamaschi Ganapini - 2020 - Episteme:1-16.details
|
|
No Epistemic Norm or Aim Needed.Marianna Bergamaschi Ganapini - 2022 - Episteme 19 (3):337-352.details
|
|
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning.Swagatanjali Bauri - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (3):415-438.details
|
|
Core Intuitions About Persons Coexist and Interfere With Acquired Christian Beliefs About God.Barlev Michael, Mermelstein Spencer & C. German Tamsin - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S3):425-454.details
|
|
Reasonable Persons, Autonomous Persons, and Lady Hale: Determining a Standard for Risk Disclosure.John Banja - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (2):25-34.details
|
|
Epistemic Trespassing.Nathan Ballantyne - 2019 - Mind 128 (510):367-395.details
|
|
The Smart System 1: evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem.Bence Bago & Wim De Neys - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 25 (3):257-299.details
|
|
Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory.Bence Bago & Wim De Neys - 2017 - Cognition 158 (C):90-109.details
|
|
Two Kinds of Process or Two Kinds of Processing? Disambiguating Dual-Process Theories.Rafael Augusto - 2024 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (1):277-298.details
|
|
The Normative Stance.Marcus Arvan - 2021 - Philosophical Forum 52 (1):79-89.details
|
|
Scaffolded Memory and Metacognitive Feelings.Santiago Arango-Muñoz - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (1):135-152.details
|
|
Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes.Robert Anthony & Mijung Kim - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (1):81-113.details
|
|
AI as Philosophical Ideology: A Critical look back at John McCarthy’s Program.Marc M. Anderson - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (2):1-24.details
|
|
Political irrationality, utopianism, and democratic theory.Aaron Ancell - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (1):3-21.details
|
|
Rationalizations primarily serve reputation management, not decision making.Sacha Altay & Hugo Mercier - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.details
|
|
The Social Cover View: a Non-epistemic Approach to Mindreading.Manuel Almagro Holgado & Víctor Fernandez Castro - 2019 - Philosophia 48 (2):483-505.details
|
|
Bridging Informal Reasoning and Formal Proving: The Role of Argumentation in Proof-Events.Sofia Almpani & Petros Stefaneas - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-25.details
|
|
Reflection, confabulation, and reasoning.Jennifer Nagel - forthcoming - In Luis Oliveira & Joshua DiPaolo (eds.), Kornblith and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell.details
|
|
Design Principles for Promoting Students’ Social Scientific Reasoning About Social Problems.Thomas Klijnstra, Gerhard L. Stoel, Gerard J. F. Ruijs, Geerte M. Savenije & Carla A. M. van Boxtel - forthcoming - Journal of Social Studies Research.details
|
|
Disagreement and the value of self-trust.Robert Pasnau - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2315-2339.details
|
|
Argumentation-induced rational issue polarisation.Felix Kopecky - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (1):83-107.details
|
|
God and the brain: the rationality of belief -- free download of entire book!Kelly James Clark - 2019 - Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.details
|
|