- Argumentation in School Science: Breaking the Tradition of Authoritative Exposition Through a Pedagogy that Promotes Discussion and Reasoning. [REVIEW]Shirley Simon & Katherine Richardson - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (4):469-493.details
|
|
A hermeneutic account of clinical psychology: Strengths and limits.Louise E. Silvern - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (1):5-27.details
|
|
The New Rhetoric’s Concept of Universal Audience, Misconceived.J. E. Sigler - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (3):325-349.details
|
|
The generalizability of critical thinking.Harvey Siegel - 1991 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 23 (1):18–30.details
|
|
?That's not fair!? argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication.Margrit Schreier, Norbert Groeben & Ursula Christmann - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (2):267-289.details
|
|
Unjustified presuppositions of competence.Leah Savion - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):364-365.details
|
|
A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation.Giovanni Sartor - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):177-211.details
|
|
An alternative logical framework for dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences.Ru Michael Sabre - 1991 - Theory and Decision 30 (3):187-211.details
|
|
Purpose, Argument Fields, and Theoretical Justification.Robert C. Rowland - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):235-250.details
|
|
Philosophy in schools.George MacDonald Ross - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 22 (2):207–219.details
|
|
Coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in patient-physician relationships: II.Traditio argumentum respectus. [REVIEW]Charles B. Rodning - 1992 - Journal of Medical Humanities 13 (3):147-156.details
|
|
Modality and its Conversational Backgrounds in the Reconstruction of Argumentation.Andrea Rocci - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):165-189.details
|
|
Comments on ‘Don’t Say That!’.Andrea Rocci - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):511-517.details
|
|
On working both sides of the street.R. L. Purtill - 1977 - Metaphilosophy 8 (2‐3):108-115.details
|
|
Argumentation Theorists Argue that an Ad is an Argument.M. Louise Ripley - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):507-519.details
|
|
Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.Eddo Rigotti & Sara Greco Morasso - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):489-512.details
|
|
The judicial dialogue.Richard D. Rieke - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (1):39-55.details
|
|
Returning to the Relations Between Logic and Argumentation, and Other Classic Issues.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):1-5.details
|
|
Introduction.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):1-6.details
|
|
Reasoning in Conversation.Lauren Resnick, Merrilee Salmon, Colleen Zeitz, Sheila Haley Wathen & Mark Holowchak - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):347-364.details
|
|
Assertion and its constitutive norms.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):98-130.details
|
|
Seeing the point of politics: Exploring the use of CSAV techniques as aids to understanding the content of political debates in the scottish parliament. [REVIEW]Alastair Renton - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (4):277-304.details
|
|
Cogency in Motion: Critical Contextualism and Relevance. [REVIEW]William Rehg - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):39-59.details
|
|
Representing and applying knowledge for argumentation in a social context.Chris Reed - 1997 - AI and Society 11 (1-2):138-154.details
|
|
On Some Aristotelian Sources of Modern Argumentation Theory.Christof Rapp & Tim Wagner - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):7-30.details
|
|
Editors' introduction.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):157-161.details
|
|
A formal model of adjudication dialogues.Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328.details
|
|
AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes.Henry Prakken - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):303-320.details
|
|
Arguing and Reasoning in Understanding Historical Topics.Clotilde Pontecorvo & Hilda Girardet - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):365-395.details
|
|
There is no need for (even fully fleshed out) mental models to map onto formal logic.Paul Pollard - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):363-364.details
|
|
Mental models, more or less.Thad A. Polk - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):362-363.details
|
|
Persuasion or Alignment?Christian Plantin - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):83-97.details
|
|
The contested nature of empirical educational research (and why philosophy of education offers little help).D. C. Phillips - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (4):577–597.details
|
|
Bridging the gap between argumentation theory and the philosophy of mathematics.Alison Pease, Alan Smaill, Simon Colton & John Lee - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):111-135.details
|
|
Remedial interchange, contrary-to-duty obligation and commutation.Xavier Parent - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (3):345-375.details
|
|
Enthymematic parsimony.Fabio Paglieri & John Woods - 2011 - Synthese 178 (3):461 - 501.details
|
|
Deduction and degrees of belief.David Over - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):361-362.details
|
|
"Dwarfs Do Not Shoot": An Analysis of Children's Justifications.Margherita Orsolini - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):281-297.details
|
|
Mental models and the tractability of everyday reasoning.Mike Oaksford - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):360-361.details
|
|
Digital technologies and artificial intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on lawyering, judging, policing and law enforcement.Ephraim Nissan - 2017 - AI and Society 32 (3):441-464.details
|
|
Do mental models provide an adequate account of syllogistic reasoning performance?Stephen E. Newstead - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):359-360.details
|
|
Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation.Ana Laura Nettel & Georges Roque - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.details
|
|
Approaches, opportunities and priorities in the rhetoric of political inquiry: A critical synthesis.John S. Nelson - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (1):21 – 42.details
|
|
Wittgensteinian instrumentalism.Alan Musgrave - 1980 - Theoria 46 (2-3):65-105.details
|
|
Understanding the law: Improving legal knowledge dissemination by translating the contents of formal sources of law. [REVIEW]Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans, Wouter Koelewijn & Hugo Kielman - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (1):51-78.details
|
|
Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments.Dima Mohammed - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):221-245.details
|
|
Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Translation Through Argumentation in Medical Research and Physician-Citizenship.Gordon R. Mitchell & Kathleen M. McTigue - 2012 - Journal of Medical Humanities 33 (2):83-107.details
|
|
On the structure of dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences.Ian I. Mitroff & Richard O. Mason - 1982 - Theory and Decision 14 (4):331-350.details
|
|
Higher-Order Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentation.Gordon R. Mitchell - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):319-335.details
|
|