Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.William Marslen-Wilson, Lorraine K. Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (1):3-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Do syllables play a role in German speech perception? Behavioral and electrophysiological data from primed lexical decision.Heidrun Bien, Jens Bölte & Pienie Zwitserlood - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Semantic processing in auditory lexical decision: Ear-of-presentation and sex differences.Lee H. Wurm, R. Douglas Whitman, Sean R. Seaman, Laura Hill & Heather M. Ulstad - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (7):1470-1495.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Real‐Time Investigation of Referential Domains in Unscripted Conversation: A Targeted Language Game Approach.Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (4):643-684.
    Two experiments examined the restriction of referential domains during unscripted conversation by analyzing the modification and online interpretation of referring expressions. Experiment 1 demonstrated that from the earliest moments of processing, addressees interpreted referring expressions with respect to referential domains constrained by the conversation. Analysis of eye movements during the conversation showed elimination of standard competition effects seen with scripted language. Results from Experiment 2 pinpointed two pragmatic factors responsible for restriction of the referential domains used by speakers to design (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Characterizing the semantic and form-based similarity spaces of the mental lexicon by means of the multi-arrangement method.Lukas Ansteeg, Frank Leoné & Ton Dijkstra - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Collecting human similarity judgments is instrumental to measuring and modeling neurocognitive representations and has been made more efficient by the multi-arrangement task. While this task has been tested for collecting semantic similarity judgments, it is unclear whether it also lends itself to phonological and orthographic similarity judgments of words. We have extended the task to include these lexical modalities and compared the results between modalities and against computational models. We find that similarity judgments can be collected for all three modalities, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Phoneme‐Order Encoding During Spoken Word Recognition: A Priming Investigation.Sophie Dufour & Jonathan Grainger - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (10):e12785.
    In three experiments, we examined priming effects where primes were formed by transposing the first and last phoneme of tri‐phonemic target words (e.g., /byt/ as a prime for /tyb/). Auditory lexical decisions were found not to be sensitive to this transposed‐phoneme priming manipulation in long‐term priming (Experiment 1), with primes and targets presented in two separated blocks of stimuli and with unrelated primes used as control condition (/mul/‐/tyb/), while a long‐term repetition priming effect was observed (/tyb/‐/tyb/). However, a clear transposed‐phoneme (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming.Willem J. Levelt, Herbert Schriefers, Dirk Vorberg & Antje S. Meyer - 1991 - Psychological Review 98 (1):122-142.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Auditory emotional cues enhance visual perception.René Zeelenberg & Bruno R. Bocanegra - 2010 - Cognition 115 (1):202-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (1 other version)What Are You Waiting For? Real‐Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.Marcus E. Galle, Jamie Klein-Packard, Kayleen Schreiber & Bob McMurray - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (1):e12700.
    Speech unfolds over time, and the cues for even a single phoneme are rarely available simultaneously. Consequently, to recognize a single phoneme, listeners must integrate material over several hundred milliseconds. Prior work contrasts two accounts: (a) a memory buffer account in which listeners accumulate auditory information in memory and only access higher level representations (i.e., lexical representations) when sufficient information has arrived; and (b) an immediate integration scheme in which lexical representations can be partially activated on the basis of early (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Semantic Involvement of Initial and Final Lexical Embeddings during Sense-Making: The Advantage of Starting Late.Petra M. van Alphen & Jos J. A. van Berkum - 2012 - Frontiers in Psychology 3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition.Dennis Norris - 1994 - Cognition 52 (3):189-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations  
  • The sequential cuing effect in speech production.Christine A. Sevald & Gary S. Dell - 1994 - Cognition 53 (2):91-127.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Error Biases in Spoken Word Planning and Monitoring by Aphasic and Nonaphasic Speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000).Ardi Roelofs - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (2):561-572.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Feature Statistics Modulate the Activation of Meaning During Spoken Word Processing.Barry J. Devereux, Kirsten I. Taylor, Billi Randall, Jeroen Geertzen & Lorraine K. Tyler - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (2):325-350.
    Understanding spoken words involves a rapid mapping from speech to conceptual representations. One distributed feature-based conceptual account assumes that the statistical characteristics of concepts’ features—the number of concepts they occur in and likelihood of co-occurrence —determine conceptual activation. To test these claims, we investigated the role of distinctiveness/sharedness and correlational strength in speech-to-meaning mapping, using a lexical decision task and computational simulations. Responses were faster for concepts with higher sharedness, suggesting that shared features are facilitatory in tasks like lexical decision (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation.Daniel Jurafsky - 1996 - Cognitive Science 20 (2):137-194.
    The problems of access—retrieving linguistic structure from some mental grammar —and disambiguation—choosing among these structures to correctly parse ambiguous linguistic input—are fundamental to language understanding. The literature abounds with psychological results on lexical access, the access of idioms, syntactic rule access, parsing preferences, syntactic disambiguation, and the processing of garden‐path sentences. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to combine models which account for these results to build a general, uniform model of access and disambiguation at the lexical, idiomatic, and syntactic levels. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words.M. Gareth Gaskell & Nicolas Dumay - 2003 - Cognition 89 (2):105-132.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months.Daniel Swingley, John P. Pinto & Anne Fernald - 1999 - Cognition 71 (2):73-108.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • A parallel architecture perspective on pre-activation and prediction in language processing.Falk Huettig, Jenny Audring & Ray Jackendoff - 2022 - Cognition 224:105050.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon.Aditi Lahiri & William Marslen-Wilson - 1991 - Cognition 38 (3):245-294.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • The Presence of Background Noise Extends the Competitor Space in Native and Non‐Native Spoken‐Word Recognition: Insights from Computational Modeling.Themis Karaminis, Florian Hintz & Odette Scharenborg - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (2):e13110.
    Oral communication often takes place in noisy environments, which challenge spoken-word recognition. Previous research has suggested that the presence of background noise extends the number of candidate words competing with the target word for recognition and that this extension affects the time course and accuracy of spoken-word recognition. In this study, we further investigated the temporal dynamics of competition processes in the presence of background noise, and how these vary in listeners with different language proficiency (i.e., native and non-native) using (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A real-time mechanism underlying lexical deficits in developmental language disorder: Between-word inhibition.Bob McMurray, Jamie Klein-Packard & J. Bruce Tomblin - 2019 - Cognition 191 (C):104000.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.Bob McMurray, Ashley Farris-Trimble & Hannah Rigler - 2017 - Cognition 169 (C):147-164.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Ambiguity, Competition, and Blending in Spoken Word Recognition.M. Gareth Gaskell & William D. Marslen–Wilson - 1999 - Cognitive Science 23 (4):439-462.
    A critical property of the perception of spoken words is the transient ambiguity of the speech signal. In localist models of speech perception this ambiguity is captured by allowing the parallel activation of multiple lexical representations. This paper examines how a distributed model of speech perception can accommodate this property. Statistical analyses of vector spaces show that coactivation of multiple distributed representations is inherently noisy, and depends on parameters such as sparseness and dimensionality. Furthermore, the characteristics of coactivation vary considerably, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • What you see isn’t always what you get: Auditory word signals trump consciously perceived words in lexical access.Rachel Ostrand, Sheila E. Blumstein, Victor S. Ferreira & James L. Morgan - 2016 - Cognition 151 (C):96-107.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)What Are You Waiting For? Real‐Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.Marcus E. Galle, Jamie Klein-Packard, Kayleen Schreiber & Bob McMurray - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (1):e12700.
    Speech unfolds over time, and the cues for even a single phoneme are rarely available simultaneously. Consequently, to recognize a single phoneme, listeners must integrate material over several hundred milliseconds. Prior work contrasts two accounts: (a) a memory buffer account in which listeners accumulate auditory information in memory and only access higher level representations (i.e., lexical representations) when sufficient information has arrived; and (b) an immediate integration scheme in which lexical representations can be partially activated on the basis of early (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis ten Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • False positives in recognition memory produced by cohort activation.William P. Wallace, Mark T. Stewart, Heather L. Sherman & Michael D. Mellor - 1995 - Cognition 55 (1):85-113.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.Anne Pier Salverda, Delphine Dahan & James M. McQueen - 2003 - Cognition 90 (1):51-89.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations