# Arithmetic, Set Theory, Reduction and Explanation

*Synthese*195 (11):5059-5089 (2018)

**Abstract**

Philosophers of science since Nagel have been interested in the links between intertheoretic reduction and explanation, understanding and other forms of epistemic progress. Although intertheoretic reduction is widely agreed to occur in pure mathematics as well as empirical science, the relationship between reduction and explanation in the mathematical setting has rarely been investigated in a similarly serious way. This paper examines an important particular case: the reduction of arithmetic to set theory. I claim that the reduction is unexplanatory. In defense of this claim, I offer evidence from mathematical practice, and I respond to contrary suggestions due to Steinhart, Maddy, Kitcher and Quine. I then show how, even if set-theoretic reductions are generally not explanatory, set theory can nevertheless serve as a legitimate foundation for mathematics. Finally, some implications of my thesis for philosophy of mathematics and philosophy of science are discussed. In particular, I suggest that some reductions in mathematics are probably explanatory, and I propose that differing standards of theory acceptance might account for the apparent lack of unexplanatory reductions in the empirical sciences.

**Keywords**

**Categories**

**Reprint years**

2018

**ISBN(s)**

**PhilPapers/Archive ID**

DALAST-2

**Revision history**

Archival date: 2017-05-21

View upload history

View upload history

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

Viewing-as Explanations and Ontic Dependence.William D’Alessandro - forthcoming -

*Philosophical Studies*:1-24.**Added to PP index**

2017-05-21

**Total views**

189 ( #13,948 of 37,985 )

**Recent downloads (6 months)**

59 ( #6,153 of 37,985 )

How can I increase my downloads?

**Monthly downloads since first upload**

*This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.*