Imagining Modernity: Kant's Wager on Possibility

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In the introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason (2nd edition), Kant claims that a transcendental cognition is a one ‘that is occupied not so much with objects but rather with our mode of cognition of objects insofar as is this ought to be possible a priori (a priori möglich sein soll)’. In this paper, I argue that Kant scholarship should take into account the specific signification of the term ‘sollen’, which might require us to reconsider the usual distinction between the system of freedom and the system of nature. Following a Fichtean perspective, I will try to show that, even if ‘sollen’ in this context does not refer to a duty in the strict sense, it does refer to the demand that transcendental philosophy itself be possible. I will argue that this demand is contingent at its very origin and, accordingly, expresses a particular kind of ‘freedom’. On this basis I will consider the tribunal of reason enacted in the Critique of Pure Reason as a tribunal that emerges from a free decision, in which the transcendental philosopher imagines its own possibility. Because it is a ‘free’ and ‘contingent’ tribunal, it cannot exceed the status of a problematic philosophical strategy.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Kant on Formal Modality.Ian S. Blecher - 2013 - Kant-Studien 104 (1):44-62.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
147 ( #22,680 of 44,318 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #19,512 of 44,318 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.