# On the Reality of the Continuum Discussion Note: A Reply to Ormell, ‘Russell's Moment of Candour’, Philosophy: Anne Newstead and James Franklin

*Philosophy*83 (1):117-127 (2008)

**Abstract**

In a recent article, Christopher Ormell argues against the traditional mathematical view that the real numbers form an uncountably inﬁnite set. He rejects the conclusion of Cantor’s diagonal argument for the higher, non-denumerable inﬁnity of the real numbers. He does so on the basis that the classical conception of a real number is mys- terious, ineffable, and epistemically suspect. Instead, he urges that mathematics should admit only ‘well-deﬁned’ real numbers as proper objects of study. In practice, this means excluding as inadmissible all those real numbers whose decimal expansions cannot be calculated in as much detail as one would like by some rule. We argue against Ormell that the classical realist account of the continuum has explanatory power in mathematics and should be accepted, much in the same way that "dark matter" is posited by physicists to explain observations in cosmology. In effect, the indefinable real numbers are like the "dark matter" of real analysis

**Keywords**

**Categories**

(categorize this paper)

**PhilPapers/Archive ID**

NEWOTR-9

**Revision history**

Archival date: 2019-02-24

View upload history

View upload history

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics: Mathematics as the Science of Quantity and Stucture.Franklin, James

**Added to PP index**

2009-01-28

**Total views**

111 ( #28,910 of 46,337 )

**Recent downloads (6 months)**

21 ( #33,685 of 46,337 )

How can I increase my downloads?

**Downloads since first upload**

*This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.*