Countable fusion not yet proven guilty: it may be the Whiteheadian account of space whatdunnit
Analysis 57 (4):249-253 (1997)
Abstract
I criticise a paper by Peter Forrest in which he argues that a principle of unrestricted countable fusion has paradoxical consequences. I argue that the paradoxical consequences that he exhibits may be due to his Whiteheadean assumptions about the nature of spacetime rather than to the principle of unrestricted countable fusion.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPCFN-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-12
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
109 ( #36,518 of 55,868 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #53,125 of 55,868 )
2009-01-28
Total views
109 ( #36,518 of 55,868 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #53,125 of 55,868 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.