# Hilbert's Objectivity

*Historia Mathematica*41 (2):188-203 (2014)

**Abstract**

Detlefsen (1986) reads Hilbert's program as a sophisticated defense of instrumentalism, but Feferman (1998) has it that Hilbert's program leaves significant ontological questions unanswered. One such question is of the reference of individual number terms. Hilbert's use of admittedly "meaningless" signs for numbers and formulae appears to impair his ability to establish the reference of mathematical terms and the content of mathematical propositions (Weyl (1949); Kitcher (1976)). The paper traces the history and context of Hilbert's reasoning about signs, which illuminates Hilbert's account of mathematical objectivity, axiomatics, idealization, and consistency.

**Categories**

**PhilPapers/Archive ID**

PATHO

**Upload history**

Archival date: 2020-07-26

View other versions

View other versions

**Added to PP index**

2014-01-05

**Total views**

82 ( #36,676 of 51,451 )

**Recent downloads (6 months)**

23 ( #24,789 of 51,451 )

How can I increase my downloads?

**Downloads since first upload**

*This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.*