- Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.details
|
|
A Synoptic History of Classical Rhetoric.James J. Murphy - 1973 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 6 (1):61-62.details
|
|
The Rhetorical Situation.Lloyd F. Bitzer - 1992 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 25 (1):1 - 14.details
|
|
Elements of logic.Richard Whately - 1827 - Delmar, N.Y.: Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.details
|
|
Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge.Karl Raimund Popper - 1965 - New York: Routledge.details
|
|
Traktat über kritische Vernunft.Hans Albert - 1968 - Tübingen,: Mohr (Siebeck).details
|
|
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.details
|
|
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.details
|
|
Proofs and refutations (IV).I. Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (56):296-342.details
|
|
Philosophy and Argumentum ad Hominem.Henry W. Johnstone - 1952 - Journal of Philosophy 49 (15):489.details
|
|
Philosophy and argumentum ad hominem.Henry W. Johnstone - 1952 - Journal of Philosophy 49 (15):489-498.details
|
|
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalisations. [REVIEW]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed & Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):125-165.details
|
|
Understanding arguments: an introduction to informal logic.Robert J. Fogelin - 1991 - San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.details
|
|
Logic and philosophy.Howard Kahane - 1969 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..details
|
|
Phaedrus. Plato & Harvey Yunis (eds.) - 1956 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Improving your reasoning.Alex C. Michalos - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.details
|
|
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.Karl Raimund Popper - 1962 - London, England: Routledge.details
|
|
Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric.Frank Boardman, Nancy M. Cavender & Howard Kahane - 2017 - [Boston, MA]: Cengage. Edited by Nancy Cavender & Howard Kahane.details
|
|
The Nature of Argument.Karel Lambert & William Ulrich - 1980 - New York, NY, USA: Upa. Edited by William Ulrich.details
|
|
From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation.Else Margarete Barth & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1982 - Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. Edited by E. C. W. Krabbe.details
|
|
Phaedrus. Plato - 1956 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (3):182-183.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric. [REVIEW]David Zarefsky - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):399-416.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation.David Zarefsky - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):317-330.details
|
|
Look, Ma! No Frans!Michael J. Wreen - 1994 - Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (2):285-306.details
|
|
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University of Toronto Press.details
|
|
The New Dialectic.Douglas Walton - 1999 - ProtoSociology 13:70-91.details
|
|
The Appeal to Ignorance, or Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (4):367-377.details
|
|
Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):53-71.details
|
|
Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):47-58.details
|
|
On Fallacies.Douglas Walton - 1972 - Journal of Critical Analysis 4 (3):103-112.details
|
|
Burden of proof.DouglasN Walton - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):233-254.details
|
|
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):329-339.details
|
|
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.details
|
|
Within Pragma-dialectics: Comments on Bonevac.M. A. van Rees - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):461-464.details
|
|
The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):344 - 364.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation.M. A. van Rees - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):473-487.details
|
|
Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.details
|
|
Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-291.details
|
|
Rules for argumentation in dialogues.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):499-510.details
|
|
Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):293-305.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.details
|
|
A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.details
|
|
On presumption.Edna Ullman-Margalit - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):143-163.details
|
|
Return to reason.Stephen Toulmin - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.details
|
|
Knowing and acting: an invitation to philosophy.Stephen Toulmin - 1977 - New York: Macmillan.details
|
|
Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise. [REVIEW]Christopher W. Tindale - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):447-466.details
|
|
Aristotle and the Legitimacy of Rhetoric.Jürgen Sprute - 2015 - In David J. Furley & Alexander Nehamas (eds.), Aristotle's Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays. Princeton University Press. pp. 117-128.details
|
|
Aristotle’s Topics B. [REVIEW]Paul Slomkowski - 1999 - The Classical Review 49 (1):126-127.details
|
|
The pragma-dialectician’s dilemma: Reply to Garssen and van Laar.Harvey Siegel & John Biro - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):457-480.details
|
|