- Pragmatic Maxims and Presumptions in Legal Interpretation.Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2018 - Law and Philosophy 37 (1):69-115.details
|
|
Revising Toulmin’s Model: Argumentative Cell and the Bias of Objectivity.Herman Thierry - unknowndetails
|
|
Anecdotal Reasoning.Louis F. Groarke - unknowndetails
|
|
What Is Visual in Visual Argumentation?Georges Roque - unknowndetails
|
|
Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference.Constanza Ihnen Jory - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):145-165.details
|
|
Toulmin: razonamiento, sentido común y derrotabilidad.Claudio Fuentes Bravo & Cristián Santibáñez Yãnez - 2014 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 55 (130):531-548.details
|
|
Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations.Maria Simosi - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):185-202.details
|
|
Argument Diagramming in Logic, Artificial Intelligence, and Law.Chris Reed, Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2007 - The Knowledge Engineering Review 22 (1):87-109.details
|
|
Non-deductive Logic in Mathematics: The Probability of Conjectures.James Franklin - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 11--29.details
|
|
The Argument of Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.) - 2013 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Is There a Fallacy of Small Sample?Thomas Leddy - 1986 - Informal Logic 8 (1).details
|
|
Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-disciplinary Guide.Marcello Guarini, Amy Butchart, Paul Simard Smith & Andrei Moldovan - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):84-197.details
|
|
Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument.George Boger - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):149-174.details
|
|
Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts.Anita Reznitskaya & Richard C. Anderson - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):175-198.details
|
|
An Informal Logic Bibliography.Hans V. Hansen - 1990 - Informal Logic 12 (3).details
|
|
Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):283-317.details
|
|
Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” – A Case Study. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (2):129-149.details
|
|
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Legal Discussions.Eveline T. Feteris - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (3).details
|
|
Assessing the Cogency of Arguments: lbree Kinds of Merits.William Rehg - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (2):95-115.details
|
|
Argumentar En Dos Disciplinas Universitarias: Una Aproximación Toulminiana a La Argumentación Académica En Letras y Biología.María Elena Molina & Constanza Padilla - 2013 - Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura 23 (1):62-79.details
|
|
(1 other version)Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-291.details
|
|
A framework for the extraction and modeling of fact-finding reasoning from legal decisions: lessons from the Vaccine/Injury Project Corpus. [REVIEW]Vern R. Walker, Nathaniel Carie, Courtney C. DeWitt & Eric Lesh - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (4):291-331.details
|
|
Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4108:208--221.details
|
|
Authority-based Argumentative Strategies: A Model for their Evaluation.Taeda Jovičić - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):1-24.details
|
|
Argumentative reasoning patterns.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2006 - In Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno (eds.), Proceedings of 6th CMNA (Computational Models of Natural Argument) Workshop, ECAI-European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. University of Trento. pp. 48-51.details
|
|
Argumentation in Mathematical Practice.Andrew Aberdein & Zoe Ashton - 2024 - In Bharath Sriraman (ed.), Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Cham: Springer. pp. 2665-2687.details
|
|
Agreeing on a Norm: What Sort of Speech Act?Cristina Corredor - 2023 - Topoi 42 (2):495-507.details
|
|
WG-A: A Framework for Exploring Analogical Generalization and Argumentation.Michael Cooper, Lindsey Fields, Marc Gabriel Badilla & John Licato - 2020 - CogSci 2020.details
|
|
A means-end classification of argumentation schemes.Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - In Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 183-201.details
|
|
Arguments of statutory interpretation and argumentation schemes.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2017 - International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (21):47–83.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.John Anthony Blair - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Using Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking in a First-Year Writing Course.Maralee Harrell & Danielle Wetzel - 2015 - In Ron Barnett & Bob Ennis Martin Davies (ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. pp. 213-232.details
|
|
The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory.Lotte van Poppel - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (1):177-208.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.details
|
|
Ethics of biogerontology: a teaching concept.Leona Litterst, Zoé Rheinsberg, Mone Spindler, Hans-Jörg Ehni, Julia Dietrich & Uta Müller - 2018 - International Journal of Ethics Education 3 (1):31-46.details
|
|
Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education.Aikaterini Konstantinidou & Fabrizio Macagno - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (5):1069-1087.details
|
|
Systematizing Toulmin’s Warrants: An Epistemic Approach.James B. Freeman - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):331-346.details
|
|
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
Visual argumentation in an Al Gore keynote presentation on climate change.Jens Kjeldsen & Michael K. Potter - unknowndetails
|
|
Argumentation as Rule-Justified Claims: Elements of a Conceptual Framework for the Critical Analysis of Argument.Michael Inbar - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):27-42.details
|
|
Purpose, Argument Fields, and Theoretical Justification.Robert C. Rowland - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):235-250.details
|
|
Subordinating Truth – Is Acceptability Acceptable?George Boger - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (2):187-238.details
|
|
The Revelation Argument. A 'Communicational Fallacy'.Marco Rühl - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):73-96.details
|
|
Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures.Peter Jan Schellens & Menno de Jong - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (3):295-323.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
The Dimensions of Argumentative Texts and Their Assessment.Fabrizio Macagno & Chrysi Rapanta - 2019 - Studia Paedagogica 24 (4):11-44.details
|
|
In the face of relativism: Stephen Toulminsʼs latest views on rhetoric and argumentation.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2015 - Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 24 (47):95-110.details
|
|
Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky.David Zarefsky - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
The Greenhouse: A Welfare Assessment and Some Morals.Christoph Lumer - 2002 - Lanham, MD; New York; Oxford: University Press of America.details
|
|
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):469-498.details
|
|