- (1 other version)The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2001 - Princeton University Press.details
|
|
(1 other version)The communication structure of epistemic communities.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):574-587.details
|
|
Dissident versus loyalist: Which scientists should we trust?Ward Jones - 2002 - Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):511-520.details
|
|
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.details
|
|
The Third Way: Reflections on Helen Longino’s T he Fate of Knowledge.Philip Kitcher - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):549-559.details
|
|
(1 other version)Reply to Helen Longino.Philip Kitcher - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):569-572.details
|
|
Bias and values in scientific research.Torsten Wilholt - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):92-101.details
|
|
Why knowledge is the property of a community and possibly none of its members.Boaz Miller - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):417-441.details
|
|
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.details
|
|
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.details
|
|
Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues From Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming.Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway - 2010 - Bloomsbury Press.details
|
|
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.Elizabeth Anderson - 2011 - Episteme 8 (2):144-164.details
|
|
Should We Aim for Consensus?Alfred Moore & John Beatty - 2010 - Episteme 7 (3):198-214.details
|
|
(1 other version)Pluralism: against the demand for consensus.Nicholas Rescher - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Norms and naturalism: Comments on Miriam Solomon's social empiricism.Helen E. Longino - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 241-245.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Social empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 1994 - Noûs 28 (3):325-343.details
|
|
Group deliberation, social cohesion, and scientific teamwork: Is there room for dissent?Deborah Perron Tollefsen - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):37-51.details
|
|
A Critical Context For Longino’s Critical Contextual Empiricism.Miriam Solomon & Alan Richardson - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):211-222.details
|
|
The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2010 - Erkenntnis 72 (1):17-35.details
|
|
Making Medical Knowledge.Miriam Solomon - 2015 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
“Trust Me—I’m a Public Intellectual”: Margaret Atwood’s and David Suzuki’s Social Epistemologies of Climate Science.Boaz Miller - 2015 - In Michael Keren & Richard Hawkins (eds.), Speaking Power to Truth: Digital Discourse and the Public Intellectual. Athabasca University Press. pp. 113-128.details
|
|
Three Criteria for Consensus Conferences.Jacob Stegenga - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):35-49.details
|
|
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.details
|
|
Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate.Larry Laudan - 1984 - University of California Press.details
|
|
Amending and defending Critical Contextual Empiricism.Kirstin Borgerson - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (3):435-449.details
|
|
Reply to Philip Kitcher.Helen E. Longino - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):573-577.details
|
|
Climate skepticism and the manufacture of doubt: can dissent in science be epistemically detrimental?Justin B. Biddle & Anna Leuschner - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):261-278.details
|
|
Are there limits to scientists' obligations to seek and engage dissenters?Kristen Intemann & Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2751-2765.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We 're Not Wrong?'.Naomi Oreskes - 2007 - In Joseph F. DiMento & Pamela Doughman (eds.), Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. MIT Press. pp. 65.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Masking Disagreement among Experts.John Beatty - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):52-67.details
|
|
(3 other versions)Deliberating groups versus prediction markets (or Hayek's challenge to Habermas).Cass R. Sunstein - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 192-213.details
|
|
A Socio‐epistemological Framework for Scientific Publishing.Judith Simon - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (3):201-218.details
|
|
(3 other versions)Deliberating Groups vs. Prediction Markets.Cass R. Sunstein - 2006 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (3):192-213.details
|
|
Socially Naturalized Norms of Epistemic Rationality: Aggregation and Deliberation.Alison Wylie - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):43-48.details
|
|
Thagard’s coherentism. [REVIEW]Majid Amini - 2000 - Philosophical Books 43 (2):136-140.details
|
|
The Study of Controversies and the Theory and History of Science.Marcelo Dascal - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (2):147-154.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Masking disagreement among experts.John Beatty - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):52-67.details
|
|
(1 other version)Market epistemology.Michael Thicke - 2017 - Synthese:1-24.details
|
|
Emotional consensus in group decision making.Paul Thagard & Fred W. Kroon - 2006 - Mind and Society 5 (1):85-104.details
|
|
The Problem of Intransigently Biased Agents.Bennett Holman & Justin P. Bruner - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):956-968.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Masking Disagreement among Experts.John Beatty - 2006 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (1):52-67.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Social Empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (303):132-136.details
|
|
Dissensus in Science as a Fact and as a Norm.Daniel Andler - 2013 - In Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag. pp. 493--506.details
|
|
Science and Values. The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate.L. Laudan - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):263-275.details
|
|
Scientific dissent and public policy. Is targeting dissent a reasonable way to protect sound policy decisions?Inmaculada de Melo-Martin & Kristen Intemann - 2013 - EMBO Reports 14 (4):231-35.details
|
|
What has collective wisdom to do with wisdom?Daniel Andler - 2012 - In J. Elster & H. Landemore (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.details
|
|